Main - № 3 (80) 2026 - SUMMARIES OF ARTICLE









RUS ENG

Translator

AzerbaijaniBasqueBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChinese (S)Chinese (T)CroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGeorgianGermanGreekHaitian CreoleHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianUrduVietnameseWelshYiddish

Download

Content of journals

PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND ADVOCACY PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Methodology of Professional Rehabilitation of Persecuted Lawyers Through the International Expert Review of the Arbitrary Termination of Advocate Status
RAGULIN Andrey Viktorovich
Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Advocate of the Moscow Chamber of Advocates, Head of the Centre for the Study of the Organization and Operation of the Advocacy of the Eurasian Scientific Research Institute of Problems of Law, Professor of the Department of Law of the Eastern Economic and Legal Humanitarian Academy, Editor-in-Chief of the «Eurasian Advocacy» Journal
450006, Ufa, Lenina Str., 102, office 24, Russian Federation
Abstract: The methodology of professional rehabilitation of persecuted lawyers through making international expert review represents a comprehensive supranational mechanism for the protection of advocates arbitrarily deprived of their professional status in conditions of inefficiency or actual degradation of national legal remedies. The methodology proceeds from the premise that the formal legality of a disciplinary or judicial decision does not in itself indicate its legitimacy if such a decision is based on political motivation, violation of international standards of fair trial, discrimination, or the use of disciplinary procedures as an instrument of pressure on lawyer. Under these conditions, the international professional community has the right to conduct an independent assessment of the circumstances of the deprivation of advocate status, to recognize the respective decisions as arbitrary, and to carry out the international professional rehabilitation of the advocate. The methodology is based on conducting an independent international expert review under the auspices of independent professional associations of lawyers. The expert review is aimed at identifying signs of arbitrary termination of advocate status, assessing compliance with international standards of the independence of the legal profession and fair trial, as well as determining the presence of politically motivated or discriminatory persecution. The methodology is based on international standards for the protection of human rights and the independence of the legal profession, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers. An adapted methodology of the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention is used as a conceptual basis. A key element of the methodology is a system of five categories (criteria) of arbitrary termination of advocate status: the lack of a proper legal basis; persecution for the exercise of fundamental rights and freedoms; gross violation of fair trial guarantees; lack of effective legal remedies; as well as the persecution of a lawyer for carrying out professional or other socially significant activities. Each category includes a system of objective criteria and typical forms of external manifestation of arbitrariness subject to expert verification. The practical significance of the methodology consists in the formation of an international mechanism for the professional rehabilitation of lawyers, the recognition of the preservation of their professional status in the international professional space, as well as the use of expert opinions for international protection, migration procedures, admission to legal practice in foreign jurisdictions, and further review of the case. The methodology is aimed at reducing the «chilling effect» on members of the lawyer community, strengthening the international solidarity of the legal profession, developing mechanisms to protect its independence, and counteracting the use of disciplinary procedures as an instrument of political and corporate persecution.
Keywords: professional rehabilitation of lawyers, arbitrary termination of advocate status, international expert review, independence of the legal profession, disciplinary proceedings against lawyers, international standards of the legal profession, human rights, international protection of lawyers, arbitrary persecution, rule of law
Список источников / References
  1. https://www.ibanet.org/Human_Rights_Institute/Toolkit-on-Lawyers-at-Risk-project
  2. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/training-admin-justice/manual-training9chapter4ru.pdf
  3. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/training-admin-justice/manual-training9chapter4ru.pdf
  4. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/training-admin-justice/manual-training9chapter4ru.pdf
  5. A/71/348, р. 32. URL: https://docs.un.org/ru/A/71/348. р. 35
  6. https://dayoftheendangeredlawyer.eu/24th-january/; https://sciup.org/mezhdunarodnyj-mehanizm-zashhity-professionalnyh-prav-advokatovintervju-s-140304585
  7. https://www.aol.com/news/why-lawyers-under-attack-around-110006144.html
  8. https://barhumanrights.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/2026-DEL-Report.pdf
  9. A/71/348, р. 32. URL: https://docs.un.org/ru/A/71/348. р. 61, 87
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272802873_The_Norms_of_International_Soft_Law_in_the_Legal_System_of_the_Russian_Federation; https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1648&context=mjil
  11. https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/Human_right_portal/EN_2026_Report-of-the-International-Coalition-for-the-Day-of-the-Endangered-Lawyer-2026-US.pdf
  12. https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/polands-solidarity-movement-1980-1989/; https://www.defendersbelarus.org/solidarnost_poland
  13. https://www.lawyersforlawyers.org/concerns-about-access-to-the-legal-profession-and-increasing-disbarments-of-lawyers-in-turkey/; https://defendlawyers.wordpress.com/tag/turkey/
  14. https://www.lawyersforlawyers.org/statement-on-the-denial-of-the-rights-of-the-defence-in-venezuela/; https://accesoalajusticia.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/The-takeover-of-Bar-Associations-of-Venezuela-2000-2020.pdf
  15. https://report2022.defendersbelarus.org/;https://bahrl.org/; https://defendlawyers.wordpress.com/tag/belarus/; https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/11/un-experts-urge-belarus-stop-interfering-legal-profession
  16. https://news.un.org/ru/story/2021/11/1413182;https://www.aibaie.org/who-we-are; https://defendlawyers.wordpress.com/tag/afghanistan/
  17. https://rm.coe.int/168007a6a9
  18. https://www.ibanet.org/MediaHandler?id=E202357C-2825-4196-B18C-827B0E6C7740; https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/EU_LAWYERS/EUL_Guides___recommendations/EN_FML_2016_Guide.pdf; https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/EU_LAWYERS/EUL_Guides___recommendations/EN_EUL_20240708_CCBE-Recommendation-on-the-recognition-of-certificates-under-Directive-98-5.pdf; https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/INTERNATIONAL_LEGAL_SERVICES/ILS_Position_papers/EN_ILS_20221125_CCBE-Guidelines-for-a-Foreign-Legal-Consultant-Status.pdf; https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/INTERNATIONAL_LEGAL_SERVICES/ILS_Position_papers/EN_ILS_20250227_CCBE-comments-on-the-Commission-recommendations-on-recognition-of-third-country-qualifications.pdf
  19. https://www.refworld.org/reference/themreport/unhrc/2015/107147; https://www.refworld.org/themes/custom/unhcr_rw/pdf-js/viewer.html?file=https %3A %2F %2Fwww.refworld.org %2Fsites %2Fdefault %2Ffiles %2Flegacy-pdf %2Fen %2F2016-7 %2F57d6a52a4.pdf; https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g15/149/11/pdf/g1514911.pdf
  20. https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/declhr.shtml
  21. https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/pactpol.shtml
  22. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/coretreatiesru.pdf
  23. https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/role_lawyers.shtml
  24. https://www.ohchr.org/ru/treaty-bodies/general-comments;https://european-court-help.ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/perechen_zamechaniy_obshchego_poryadka_obshchih_rekomendatsiy_prinyatyh_megdunarodnymi_dogovornymi_organami_oon_deystvuyushchimi_v_sfere_zashc.pdf?ysclid=mox41kapbu390235840
  25. https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/defender.shtml
  26. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Convention_RUS
  27. https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=226; https://sciup.org/konvencija-soveta-evropy-o-zashhite-professii-advokata-140309882
  28. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1977/249/oj/eng; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1998/5/oj/eng
  29. https://rm.coe.int/16804d0fc8; https://e-ecolog.ru/docs/AMN7bgOpGM89dI8FfKcyo
  30. https://www.ohchr.org/ru/special-procedures/sr-independence-of-judges-and-lawyers/international-standards-independence-judges-lawyers-and-prosecutors; https://www.advokatsamfundet.se/globalassets/advokatsamfundet_sv/advokatyrket/ccbe_recommendations_disciplinary_proceedings_en1.pdf;https://www.ibanet.org/resources; https://www.ibanet.org/document?id=-International-Principles-on-Conduct-for-the-Legal-Profession-2018; https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/DEONTOLOGY/DEON_CoC/EN_DEONTO_2021_Model_Code.pdf; https://www.ccbe.eu/documents/professional-regulations/#panel-712-0
  31. https://sudact.ru/law/obobshchenie-praktiki-i-pravovykh-pozitsii-mezhdunarodnykh-dogovornykh/; https://normativ.kontur.ru/document?moduleId=1&documentId=218896
  32. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng# %20
  33. https://base.garant.ru/; https://www.consultant.ru/; https://www.refworld.org/ru/prosmotr-po/tematicheskie-napravleniya
  34. https://fparf.ru/documents/
  35. https://sudact.ru/
  36. https://sciup.org/eurasian-advocacy; https://www.ohchr.org/en/publications/training-and-education-publications/human-rights-administration-justice-manual-human; https://eucrim.eu/articles/a-plea-for-common-standards-on-the-lawyer-client-privilege/;https://www.ccbe.eu/document/PECO_Portal/Georgian_Bar_Association_conference_Nov_2015/Speech_Emmanuel_Pierrat__002_.pdfс; https://openlibrary.org/authors/OL71726A/Andrew_Boon; https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=273330; https://philpapers.org/rec/BAREAL-11; https://riuc.ru/local/templates/humanrights/pdf/Реализация %20международных %20стандартов %20прав %20человека %20судами %20РФ %20(2017).pdf; https://www.ibanet.org/Human_Rights_Institute/Toolkit-on-Lawyers-at-Risk-project
  37. https://docs.un.org/ru/A/HRC/50/36
  38. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_44722/
  39. https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/12032854/
  40. Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, ECHR, № 55480/00 and 59330/00 https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng# %7B %22itemid %22: [ %22001-61942 %22] %7D, Bigaeva v. Greece, ECHR, № 26713/05 https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng# %7B %22appno %22: [ %2226713/05 %22], %22itemid %22: [ %22001-92754 %22] %7D
  41. Ozpinar v. Turkey, ECHR, № 20999/04. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng# %7B %22itemid %22: [ %22001-101220 %22] %7D
  42. Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, ECHR, № 21722/11 https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre# %7B %22itemid %22: [ %22001-115871 %22] %7D
  43. Ozpinar v. Turkey, ECHR, № 20999/04, https://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB&n=195155&ysclid=lvrlrusixk255134835#OSsCmBUmt6wEWJo4; Pfeifer v. Austria, ECHR, № 12556/03, https://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB&n=65881&ysclid=lvrluwr6ds547098647#qmSDmBUJncL1b3bD; A. v. Norway, ECHR, № 28070/06, https://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB&n=121802&ysclid=lvrmbv3nj6953760718#QgmGmBUE3s4k5g8O1
  44. Malone v. United Kingdom, ECHR, № 8619/ 79, https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/67315/?ysclid=lvrmab4j9q771486675
  45. https://web.dev.ohchr.un-icc.cloud/ru/specialprocedures/sr-independence-of-judges-and-lawyers/international-standards-independence-judges-lawyersand-prosecutors, https://www.ohchr.org/ru/aboutarbitrary-detention; https://www.ohchr.org/ru/specialprocedures/sr-executions/international-standards
  46. https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g15/149/11/pdf/g1514911.pdf
  47. https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/role_lawyers.shtml; https://coloradoattorneyexcellence.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Rhode-D-Whatever-Happened-to-Access-to-Justice-42-Loy.-L.A.-L.-Rev.-869-2009..pdf
  48. A/HRC/50/36, р. 82. URL: https://docs.un.org/ru/A/HRC/50/36
  49. А/73/365, р. 115–120. URL: https://docs.un.org/ru/A/73/365
  50. https://www.ibanet.org/IBAHRI
  51. https://www.ibanet.org/document?id=-International-Principles-on-Conduct-for-the-Legal-Profession-2018
  52. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/resources/lawyer_ethics_regulation/; https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/resources/lawyer_ethics_regulation/model_rules_for_lawyer_disciplinary_enforcement/
  53. https://www.encyclopedia.com/law/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/attorney-misconduct
  54. https://www.ibanet.org/MediaHandler?id=d0166ab6-5307-4798-aefc-805b2e79e461
  55. https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Guidance-Note-on-Sanctions-2022.pdf
  56. https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/enforcement/solicitors-disciplinary-tribunal/; https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/
  57. https://legalservicesboard.org.uk/
  58. https://flsc.ca/what-we-do/national-discipline-standards/
  59. https://flsc.ca/; https://ca.vlex.com/vid/mcguire-v-b-c-681711657
  60. https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/DISCIPLINE/EN_DISC_20070917_CCBE_Recommendations_disciplinary_proceedings.pdf; https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/DEONTOLOGY/DEON_CoC/EN_DEONTO_2021_Model_Code.pdf
  61. https://sciup.org/konvencija-soveta-evropy-o-zashhite-professii-advokata-140309882
  62. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_36945/
  63. https://fparf.ru/documents/fpa-rf/documents-of-the-congress/the-code-of-professional-ethics-of-lawyer/
  64. https://ccprcentre.org/decision/17209;https://www.defendersbelarus.org/ageev_cohr; https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/403239997/#927
  65. https://humanrts.umn.edu/russian/gencomm/Rhrcom32.html
  66. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng# %7B %22itemid %22: [ %22001-57479 %22] %7D
  67. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/clear_and_convincing_evidence
  68. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng# %7B %22itemid %22: [ %22002-11088 %22] %7D; https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre# %7B %22itemid %22: [ %22001-115871 %22] %7D
  69. https://www.perlego.com/book/4300831/the-ethics-and-conduct-of-lawyers-in-england-and-wales-pdf; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1460728x.2016.1209811; https://philpapers.org/rec/BOOTEA-2; https://philpapers.org/rec/SILHOP-3
  70. https://pklaw.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Statya.-K-voprosu-o-prezumpcii-dobrosovestnosti-advokata.pdf;https://www.advgazeta.ru/arhivnye-zapisi/advokatura-eto-zapovednaya-sfera-dlya-pravookhranitelya/
  71. https://sciup.org/ponjatie-i-kriterii-proizvolnogo-lishenija-prekrashhenija-statusa-advokata-140308757
  72. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/library/2013/02/26/Girardi_sanctions.pdf; https://adbmich.org/links/aba-standards.aspx
  73. https://www.ohchr.org/en/publications/training-and-education-publications/human-rights-administration-justice-manual-human
  74. https://dayoftheendangeredlawyer.eu/24th-january/
  75. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zayavlenie-o-vvedenii-vozmozhnosti-prekrascheniya-statusa-advokata-pri-vyyavlenii-fakta-ego-vyezda-na-postoyannoe-mesto-zhitelstva
  76. https://sciup.org/zahvat-advokatury-i-presledovanie-advokatov-v-rossijskoj-federaciikak-140310760
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND ADVOCACY PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
The Bar in the Russian Federation: Chronicle of the Crisis (August 2025 – May 2026): Scientific and Practical Report
RAGULIN Andrey Viktorovich
Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Advocate of the Moscow Chamber of Advocates, Head of the Centre for the Study of the Organization and Operation of the Advocacy of the Eurasian Scientific Research Institute of Problems of Law, Professor of the Department of Law of the Eastern Economic and Legal Humanitarian Academy, Editor-in-Chief of the «Eurasian Advocacy» Journal
450006, Ufa, Lenina Str., 102, office 24, Russian Federation
Abstract: The report is an analytical review of the systemic problems faced by the modern bar in the Russian Fede-ration. Numerous cases of criminal prosecution of lawyers, which are directly linked to their professional and public activities, have been documented. An alarming trend has been recorded: lawyers working on high-profile or politically sensitive cases are subjected to selective justice, including detentions, searches, and unfounded criminal charges. Special attention is paid to the pressure on lawyers through the disciplinary mechanisms of the bar chambers, which, contrary to their intended purpose, are increasingly used as an instrument of «punitive ethics». The campaign for the forced introduction of the so-called «advocate monopoly», conducted by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Fede-ration and supported by the Federal Chamber of Advocates (FCA), is highlighted. Facts of state interference in confidential communication between lawyers and their clients, violations of attorney-client privilege, and illegal searches in defenders’ offices are presented. A separate section highlights the problems associated with the implementation of the Comprehensive Information System of the Russian Bar, which in reality is an instrument of cyber espionage and total control over lawyers. The report analyzes the activities of the FCA, which has lost its human rights function and turned into an appendage of the state apparatus. It is shown how the FCA and the leadership of the bar chambers, using administrative resources, suppress freedom of speech within the corporation and hinder the real democratization of the profession. Acute issues of lawyer protection, financial transparency of bar chambers, and the misuse of funds collected from lawyers are raised. Measures aimed at bringing the bar system out of the crisis state are proposed. The report is published in Russian and English.
Keywords: professional rehabilitation of lawyers, arbitrary termination of advocate status, disbarment, independence of the legal profession, disciplinary proceedings against lawyers, international standards of the legal profession, human rights, international protection of lawyers, arbitrary persecution, rule of law, the Bar in Russia
Список источников / References
  1. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zahvat-advokatury-i-presledovanie-advokatov-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii-kak-vernut-nezavisimost-advokatov-i-pravo-grazhdan-na-zaschitu
  2. https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/opros-o-praktike-obespecheniya-garantiy-advokatov/
  3. https://legalpetition.org/monitoring-narusheniya-professionalnyhprav-i-presledovaniya-advokatov-v-2025-godu/
  4. https://t.me/initiative2018/3130
  5. https://t.me/initiative2018/3098
  6. https://t.me/initiative2018/3100; https://defendlawyers.wordpress.com/2025/09/07/russia-kaliningrad-lawyer-vladimir-sorokin-detained-in-fbk-donation-case-navalny-foundation/
  7. https://t.me/initiative2018/3104; https://t.me/initiative2018/3106
  8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_dcHzVZ0wE; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zayavlenie-pravleniya-mezhregionalnoy-obschestvennoy-organizatsii-advokatov-i-yuristov-initsiativa-2018-o-presledovanii-i-obyskah-u
  9. https://t.me/initiative2018/3151
  10. https://t.me/initiative2018/3198
  11. https://t.me/initiative2018/3077; https://t.me/initiative2018/3081; https://svobodnykaliningrad.com/main/100575-karatelnoe-pravosudie.html
  12. https://t.me/initiative2018/3266
  13. https://t.me/initiative2018/2887
  14. https://t.me/initiative2018/2874
  15. https://t.me/initiative2018/3327
  16. https://t.me/endoflaw/1339?single
  17. https://t.me/initiative2018/3318
  18. https://t.me/initiative2018/3481
  19. https://t.me/initiative2018/3681
  20. https://t.me/initiative2018/3835; https://t.me/initiative2018/3853
  21. https://t.me/initiative2018/3801
  22. https://t.me/initiative2018/3845
  23. https://t.me/endoflaw/1672; https://t.me/endoflaw/1656; https://t.me/endoflaw/1636
  24. https://t.me/initiative2018/4644
  25. https://t.me/initiative2018/4644
  26. https://t.me/initiative2018/4685
  27. https://www.ohchr.org/ru/press-releases/2025/07/russia-must-release-ill-lawyer-maria-bontsler-detained-retaliation-human
  28. https://ludovictrarieux.org/fr-page3.callplt2025.htm; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/advokat-dmitriy-talantov-laureat-mezhdunarodnoy-premii-imeni-lyudovika-trarie-v-oblasti-prav-cheloveka-2025-1; https://defendlawyers.wordpress.com/2025/11/15/russia-speech-by-lawyer-dmitry-talantov-winner-of-ludovic-trarieux-international-human-rights-prize-2025/
  29. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dmitriy-talantov-i-initsiativa-2018-advokaty-i-yuristy-za-demokratiyu-i-verhovenstvo-prava
  30. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1QPUtcQN4M; https://t.me/initiative2018/3760; https://t.me/initiative2018/3761; https://t.me/initiative2018/3765
  31. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8177941
  32. https://t.me/initiative2018/4320
  33. https://t.me/initiative2018/4344
  34. https://news.un.org/ru/story/2024/11/1458796
  35. https://t.me/initiative2018/3134
  36. https://t.me/initiative2018/3140
  37. https://t.me/rusnews/75069; https://t.me/initiative2018/3230
  38. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/7442840
  39. https://t.me/initiative2018/4389; https://t.me/initiative2018/4395
  40. https://news.un.org/ru/story/2025/01/1460536
  41. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pismo-s-utverzhdeniyami-o-narusheniyah-ot-spetsialnogo-dokladchika-oon-po-voprosu-o-nezavisimosti-sudey-i-advokatov-rabochey-gruppy
  42. https://t.me/initiative2018/3335; https://t.me/initiative2018/3340
  43. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8099617; https://ufanovosti.ru/news/social/2025-10-08/v-bashkirii-advokat-poydet-pod-sud-za-razglashenie-vrachebnoy-tayny-4419063
  44. https://t.me/udm_info/25611
  45. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8140728
  46. https://t.me/sudUdm/2968; https://tass.ru/proisshestviya/25419929
  47. https://t.me/initiative2018/3702
  48. https://prokazan.ru/news/view/v-kazani-advokata-sudat-za-opravdanie-podzasitnogo-ee-obvinaut-v-davlenii-na-prisaznyh; https://dzen.ru/a/aP9yJUi7FkCl_aA; https://www.business-gazeta.ru/news/686322, https://kazanonline24.ru/novosti-tatarstana/view/advokatu-iz-kazani-grozit-sud-posle-vyigrysa-dela-ob-ubijstvah-delo-inna-barleva; https://novosti.tatar/proishestvie/3803-advokat-vyigrala-staroe-delo-ob-ubijstvakh-v-kazani; https://rutube.ru/video/2194a794661f8ffd300860187e7d9355; https://116.ru/text/gorod/2025/10/26/76090426; https://defendlawyers.wordpress.com/2025/10/28/russia-lawyer-and-journalist-tried-in-kazan-for-obstructing-justice/
  49. https://t.me/initiative2018/3750
  50. https://t.me/initiative2018/3950
  51. https://teletype.in/@ozero2.0/delo-protiv-pavlova-smirnova-pervyj-otdel?ysclid=mn6emkgo60858136291
  52. https://news.ru/incidents/udar-po-komande-za-chto-zaderzhali-advokata-ivana-pavlova
  53. https://chel.sledcom.ru/news/item/2039784/?ysclid=mj1r5bl7av80426368
  54. https://t.me/initiative2018/4176
  55. https://t.me/initiative2018/4183
  56. https://t.me/sledcom_press/25474
  57. https://www.ohchr.org/ru/press-releases/2026/02/russia-must-end-reprisals-and-intimidation-icc-prosecutor-and-judges-un
  58. https://t.me/initiative2018/4223; https://www.e1.ru/text/criminal/2025/12/16/76173863/; https://t.me/initiative2018/4226; https://t.me/initiative2018/4228
  59. https://t.me/initiative2018/4252; https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8294047
  60. https://t.me/initiative2018/4558
  61. https://t.me/initiative2018/4454
  62. https://t.me/initiative2018/4459
  63. https://t.me/initiative2018/4462
  64. https://t.me/initiative2018/4484
  65. https://t.me/initiative2018/4522
  66. https://t.me/initiative2018/4650
  67. https://t.me/initiative2018/4696
  68. https://t.me/initiative2018/4781
  69. https://t.me/initiative2018/4486
  70. https://t.me/initiative2018/4528; https://t.me/initiative2018/4539
  71. https://t.me/initiative2018/4490; https://t.me/initiative2018/4562; https://dzen.ru/a/aY-UidSrMzjM0zP0; https://www.cpiong.fr/2026/02/13/oleg-stepanov-arestovan-po-delu-ob-uchastii-v-deyatelnosti-terroristicheskoj-organizaczii/
  72. https://slovo-zashite.org/analysis/novyi-prikaz-miniusta-ob-advokatskom-ordere-razbor-podvodnykh-kamnei; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/antiadvokatskiy-zakon-v-deystvii-chem-grozit-novyy-prikaz-ministerstva-yustitsii-rossiyskoy-federatsii-ob-advokatskom-ordere
  73. https://murmansk.mk.ru/incident/2026/02/18/advokat-v-murmanske-poddelal-order-i-slil-chuzhie-lichnye-dannye-za-10-tysyach.html
  74. https://t.me/endoflaw/907
  75. https://t.me/moscowcourts/8257
  76. https://t.me/initiative2018/4595
  77. https://www.rbc.ru/society/29/01/2026/697b9d079a79475ac5fcbaf0; https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8397915; https://pravo.ru/news/262239/
  78. https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/primorskogo-advokata-obvinyayut-v-primenenii-nasiliya-v-otnoshenii-sotrudnitsy-politsii/; https://vladivostok1.ru/text/gorod/2026/01/31/76238182/; https://www.newsvl.ru/vlad/2026/02/12/236737/; https://vl.aif.ru/society/sud-ne-stal-arestovyvat-advokata-kotorogo-podozrevayut-v-nasilii
  79. https://t.me/initiative2018/3057; https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8228564 https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2024/08/02/deistvuiushchikh-sudei-est-kem-zamenit
  80. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8228444
  81. https://t.me/initiative2018/3111
  82. https://t.me/initiative2018/3312; https://t.me/initiative2018/3315; https://defendlawyers.wordpress.com/2025/09/27/russia-lawyer-dmitry-zakhvatov-who-defended-dissidents-declared-foreign-agent/
  83. https://ria.ru/20250426/delo-2013537909.html; https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8076665?ysclid=mn6jfuw96q269845086#id2917623
  84. https://t.me/endoflaw/2491
  85. https://t.me/initiative2018/4751
  86. https://minjust.gov.ru/ru/pages/perechen-inostrannyh-i-mezhdunarodnyh-organizacij-deyatelnost-kotoryh-priznana-nezhelatelnoj-na-territorii-rossijskoj-federacii/
  87. https://rg.ru/documents/2026/05/29/organizacii-dok.html; https://www.vesti.ru/ns/minyust-vnes-tri-organizacii-iz-francii-i-ssha-v-spisok-nezhelatelnykh-v-rf; https://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/6a0723a49a7947d3df0c4452
  88. https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/ap-krasnodarskogo-kraya-vyrazila-obespokoennost-provedeniem-obyska-v-zhilishche-advokata-bez-sanktsi/
  89. https://www.advokatymoscow.ru/press/news/15083/
  90. https://t.me/initiative2018/4177
  91. https://t.me/endoflaw/1896
  92. https://legalacts.ru/doc/postanovlenie-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rf-ot-17122015-n/
  93. https://t.me/initiative2018/2980; https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/ulyanovskiy-advokat-soobshchila-o-narusheniyakh-konfidentsialnosti-svidaniy-s-zaklyuchennymi-v-kolonii/
  94. https://t.me/initiative2018/3019
  95. https://t.me/initiative2018/3096; https://t.me/apspbprotection/417
  96. https://www.palatakd.ru/content/news/3030/
  97. https://t.me/apspbprotection/433
  98. https://t.me/initiative2018/3662
  99. https://t.me/endoflaw/1990
  100. https://t.me/initiative2018/4422
  101. https://t.me/initiative2018/4533
  102. https://t.me/initiative2018/4536
  103. https://t.me/initiative2018/4610
  104. https://t.me/initiative2018/4611
  105. https://t.me/initiative2018/4674
  106. https://t.me/initiative2018/4786
  107. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2026/04/strategy-blatant-abuse-counter-terrorism-and-extremism-laws-destroy-russian
  108. https://t.me/initiative2018/4790; https://www.forbes.ru/society/558923-v-redakcii-novoj-gazety-v-moskve-zaversilis-obyski
  109. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8553587
  110. https://t.me/initiative2018/4756
  111. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obraschenie-zaschitim-rossiyskuyu-advokaturu-2023; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nezavisimoe-ekspertnoe-zaklyuchenie-na-proekt-federalnogo-zakona-o-vnesenii-izmeneniy-v-federalnyy-zakon-ob-advokatskoy; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/novyy-zakonoproekt-o-vnesenii-izmeneniy-v-federalnyy-zakon-ob-advokatskoy-deyatelnosti-i-advokature-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii-put-k; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/izmeneniya-v-zakonodatelstvo-ob-advokature-napravleny-na-podavlenie-nezavisimosti-advokatov-i-advokatury-v-rossii
  112. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zayavlenie-o-vvedenii-vozmozhnosti-prekrascheniya-statusa-advokata-pri-vyyavlenii-fakta-ego-vyezda-na-postoyannoe-mesto-zhitelstva
  113. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zayavlenie-spetsialnogo-dokladchika-oon-po-voprosu-o-polozhenii-v-oblasti-prav-cheloveka-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii-i-spetsialnogo
  114. https://t.me/initiative2018/3273
  115. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8119426; https://www.vedomosti.ru/society/articles/2025/10/14/1146562-minyust-hochet-prekratit-status-treh-izvestnih-advokatov; https://www.rbc.ru/society/20/10/2025/68ed2dfb9a79475dd4a2d574?
  116. https://t.me/tayskayaGramota/1152
  117. https://t.me/initiative2018/3793
  118. https://t.me/endoflaw/866
  119. https://defendlawyers.wordpress.com/2026/05/30/russia-silencing-the-defense/
  120. https://t.me/initiative2018/4585; https://t.me/moscow_bar_association/2605
  121. https://pravo.ru/news/262490/
  122. https://t.me/initiative2018/4745
  123. https://t.me/initiative2018/4783
  124. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/6280611; https://defendlawyers.wordpress.com/2026/04/09/russia-statement-on-unlawful-practice-aimed-at-terminating-status-of-advocate-in-connection-with-prolonged-stay-abroad/
  125. https://t.me/initiative2018/4744; https://t.me/initiative2018/4759; https://t.me/initiative2018/4760; https://t.me/initiative2018/4761; https://t.me/initiative2018/4766; https://t.me/initiative2018/4775; https://t.me/initiative2018/4782
  126. https://t.me/initiative2018/4818
  127. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8586401; https://zakon.ru/blog/2026/4/17/antologiya_bespraviya_kak_sudebnoe_reshenie_o_prekraschenii_statusa_advokatov_alekseya_basistova_dmi_115822
  128. https://t.me/initiative2018/4645
  129. https://t.me/initiative2018/4586
  130. https://t.me/initiative2018/2819
  131. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/7659601
  132. https://lenta.ru/news/2025/09/25/zayavivshiy-o-pytkah-klienta-advokat-navlek-na-sebya-problemy-ot-fsb/; https://ria.ru/20250925/advokat-2044285267.html; https://defendlawyers.wordpress.com/2025/09/26/russia-lawyer-who-reported-clients-torture-lands-himself-in-trouble-with-fsb-faces-disciplinary-proceedings/
  133. https://t.me/initiative2018/3337; https://www.rbc.ru/society/26/09/2025/68d5aee89a7947275b3768c8
  134. https://t.me/initiative2018/4388
  135. https://legalpetition.org/trebuem-prekratit-discziplinarnoe-proizvodstvo-v-otnoshenii-advokata-aleksandra-chauzova/
  136. https://defendlawyers.wordpress.com/2026/01/14/russia-disciplinary-proceedings-initiated-against-lawyer-bontslers-lawyer/
  137. https://t.me/initiative2018/4437
  138. https://t.me/initiative2018/2857
  139. https://t.me/initiative2018/3138
  140. https://t.me/initiative2018/3792
  141. https://t.me/initiative2018/3388
  142. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8231619; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/reshenie-suda-bylo-ozhidaemym/
  143. https://t.me/initiative2018/4376; https://t.me/initiative2018/4378; https://defendlawyers.wordpress.com/2026/01/13/russia-more-than-15000-lawyers-with-active-status-disappeared-from-justice-ministry-register/
  144. https://t.me/initiative2018/4387
  145. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ugrozy-funktsionirovaniya-edinogo-gosudarstvennogo-reestra-advokatov-analiz-uyazvimostey-na-primere-intsidenta-2026-goda
  146. https://t.me/initiative2018/2805?single
  147. https://tass.ru/proisshestviya/24758339
  148. https://t.me/initiative2018/2936
  149. https://t.me/initiative2018/2923; https://t.me/initiative2018/2924; https://defendlawyers.wordpress.com/2025/08/16/russia-rights-lawyer-sergey-naumov-beaten-by-a-hooligan-in-saransk/
  150. https://t.me/endoflaw/859
  151. https://t.me/initiative2018/4531
  152. https://t.me/initiative2018/3023; https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/advokat-otstoyala-v-sude-pravo-na-oplatu-zashchity-po-naznacheniyu/
  153. https://t.me/initiative2018/3031
  154. https://t.me/initiative2018/2960
  155. https://www.ugpr.ru/news/8902-sud-vernul-advokatu-status-ap-ne-predstavila-dostatochnyh-dokazatelstv-ego-karmannosti; https://t.me/initiative2018/3437
  156. https://t.me/initiative2018/4401; https://slovo-zashite.org/news/advokatskaia-palata-peterburga-davit-na-advokata-viktora-drozdova-pozhalovavshegosia-v-sk-rf-na-ee-rukovodstvo-za-pobory-i-klevetu
  157. https://t.me/initiative2018/4609
  158. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zayavlenie-pravleniya-mezhregionalnoy-obschestvennoy-organizatsii-advokatov-i-yuristov-initsiativa-2018-o-proizvolnom-prekraschenii; https://defendlawyers.wordpress.com/2026/03/21/russia-disciplinary-case-against-advocate-viktor-drozdov-illegal-contributions-and-punitive-ethics/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAQrcrZjbGNrBCtysGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHslTMXeafXclOlfw2CdycxyOyqleVuqZXk03nNq0Vi5pkCC3jTL3wYsPzTNI_aem_PNG3Tg2XqLEra4nu7yg5MQ
  159. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/distsiplinarnoe-delo-advokata-viktora-drozdova-nezakonnye-vznosy-i-karatelnaya-etika
  160. https://t.me/initiative2018/4594
  161. https://t.me/initiative2018/2885
  162. https://t.me/initiative2018/3137; https://t.me/initiative2018/3397
  163. https://t.me/initiative2018/3391
  164. https://t.me/fparf/13664
  165. https://t.me/initiative2018/4097
  166. https://t.me/endoflaw/986
  167. https://t.me/initiative2018/4410
  168. https://t.me/initiative2018/2867; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/24-chasa-yuridicheskogo-soprotivleniya-itogi-pervogo-antimonopolnogo-marafona-natsionalnogo-profsoyuza-yuristov
  169. https://t.me/initiative2018/2872
  170. https://t.me/initiative2018/4381; https://t.me/broblsud/6100; https://t.me/initiative2018/4396
  171. https://t.me/initiative2018/4671
  172. https://finance.mail.ru/card/mediannaya-zarplata-1140/#card-76714
  173. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/fiskalnaya-izoschryonnost-v-moskovskoy-advokature-o-protivopravnosti-ustanovleniya-obyazatelnyh-ezhemesyachnyh-otchisleniy; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nekotorye-voprosy-regulirovaniya-instituta-priostanovleniya-statusa-advokata-v-svete-resheniy-advokatskoy-palaty-goroda-moskvy
  174. https://t.me/initiative2018/4412
  175. https://www.advokatymoscow.ru/advocate/activity/info/15316/
  176. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ne-izbiraemye-advokatami-demokraticheskim-putem-upravlentsy-iz-federalnoy-palaty-pyat-let-na-otvet-bez-otveta; https://t.me/initiative2018/3227
  177. https://t.me/initiative2018/3519
  178. https://t.me/initiative2018/4551
  179. https://t.me/initiative2018/3332; https://t.me/initiative2018/3333; https://t.me/initiative2018/3338
  180. https://slovo-zashite.org/api/v1/shorter/EVJ47
  181. https://t.me/rvmorozov/16293
  182. https://t.me/initiative2018/4140; https://t.me/initiative2018/4141
  183. https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/opros-o-praktike-obespecheniya-garantiy-advokatov/; https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8212487; https://www.mk.ru/social/2025/11/19/bolee-poloviny-oproshennykh-advokatov-priznalis-chto-im-ugrozhali-sledovateli.html
  184. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zahvat-advokatury-i-presledovanie-advokatov-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii-kak-vernut-nezavisimost-advokatov-i-pravo-grazhdan-na-zaschitu
  185. https://www.ng.ru/politics/2026-02-01/3_9427_fsin.html
  186. https://fparf.ru/news/media/nedopusk-eto-sistemnaya-problema/
  187. https://t.me/initiative2018/2911
  188. https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/zashchitniki-advokatov-alekseya-navalnogo-poluchili-tekst-apellyatsionnogo-opredeleniya/
  189. https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/v-fpa-rf-postupilo-trevozhnoe-soobshchenie-s-dalnego-vostoka/; https://t.me/initiative2018/4023
  190. https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/svetlana-volodina-i-lyudmila-lyamina-obsudili-aktualnye-zadachi/
  191. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ocherednoy-proval-storonnikov-advokatskoy-monopolii-sudebnyy-departament-obyavil-prigovor-federalnoy-palate-advokatov
  192. https://t.me/initiative2018/4916
  193. https://t.me/endoflaw/1294; https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/advokatskoe-soobshchestvo-v-tselom-udovletvoreno-kpea/
  194. https://t.me/initiative2018/3384; https://t.me/initiative2018/4161
  195. https://slovo-zashite.org/text/golodnye-advokaty-gumannye-tribunaly
  196. https://t.me/initiative2018/4198
  197. https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/budet-sformirovana-edinaya-sudebnaya-praktika-osnovannaya-na-deystvuyushchikh-mezhdunarodnykh-obyaza/; https://t.me/initiative2018/4178
  198. https://t.me/initiative2018/4279; https://t.me/initiative2018/4284
  199. https://t.me/initiative2018/4302
  200. https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/ya-grazhdanin-pravo-otvetstvennost-deystvie/
  201. https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/zhizn-pokazala-esli-my-ne-nachnem-rano-budet-pozdno/
  202. https://t.me/initiative2018/3848; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ya-poddannyy-bespravie-bezotvetstvennost-bezdeystvie-istinnaya-sut-psevdopatrioticheskogo-proekta-ot-repressivnyh-pedagogov-iz
  203. https://t.me/fparf/13454
  204. https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/predstavitel-tulskoy-oblastnoy-advokatskoy-palaty-prinyal-uchastie-vo-vstreche-shtaba-komiteta-semey/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/predstavitel-ap-chelyabinskoy-oblasti-vystupil-v-ramkakh-seminara-realizatsiya-prav-uchastnikov-svo/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/v-advokatskoy-palate-astrakhanskoy-oblasti-proveden-seminar-po-voprosam-okazaniya-besplatnoy-yuridich/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/advokaty-tulskoy-oblasti-prinyali-uchastie-vo-vstreche-s-semyami-uchastnikov-svo/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/advokaty-tulskoy-oblasti-prinyali-uchastie-v-aktsii-geroi-odnoy-strany-svo-10.25/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/vitse-prezident-ap-omskoy-oblasti-roman-kazakov-prinyal-uchastie-vo-vserossiyskom-soveshchanii/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/vstrecha-advokatskikh-palat-bashkortostana-i-kabardino-balkarii-voprosy-podderzhki-uchastnikov/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/otmechena-vazhnost-planiruemoy-reformy-sudebnogo-predstavitelstva/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/ap-altayskogo-kraya-provela-obuchayushchee-meropriyatie-posvyashchennoe-voprosam-okazaniya-yuridiche/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/v-upravlenii-minyusta-rossii-po-permskomu-krayu-s-uchastiem-predstaviteley-advokatskoy-palaty-sostoya/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/v-arkhangelske-s-uchastiem-predstaviteley-upravleniya-minyusta-rossii-upravleniya-fssp-rossii/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/prezident-ap-respubliki-bashkortostan-bulat-yumadilov-vystupil-na-kruglom-stole-posvyashchennom-okaz/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/v-lyuberetskom-sudebnom-rayone-s-uchastiem-predstavitelya-ap-moskovskoy-oblasti-podveli-itogi/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/12-fevralya-pervyy-vitse-prezident-advokatskoy-palaty-ulyanovskoy-oblasti-valeriy-chernyshov-prinyal/
  205. https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/advokatskaya-palata-ulyanovskoy-oblasti-opublikovala-intervyu-s-advokatom-uchastnikom-svo-sergeem-ra/?clckid=4fd26454
  206. https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/pobeda-nad-formalizmom-i-byurokratizmom/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/advokat-respubliki-tatarstan-prinyal-uchastie-v-okazanii-besplatnoy-yuridicheskoy-pomoshchi-uchastni/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/sudebnye-akty-prinyaty-v-polzu-isttsa/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/bryanskiy-advokat-valeriya-artemeva-okazala-besplatnuyu-yuridicheskuyu-pomoshch-nuzhdayushchimsya/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/advokatskaya-palata-voronezhskoy-oblasti-opublikovala-informatsiyu-ob-intervyu-chlena-soveta-palaty/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/bryanskiy-advokat-lyudmila-nikolskaya-prokonsultirovala-veterana-svo-v-khode-pervogo/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/v-ulyanovskoy-oblasti-pri-uchastii-advokatskoy-palaty-regiona-provedena-aktsiya-v-podderzhku-uchastn/; https://fparf.ru/polemic/opinions/zashchishchaya-togo-kto-zashchishchal-nas/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/bryanskiy-advokat-elena-zaytseva-na-regulyarnoy-osnove-okazyvaet-besplatnuyu-yuridicheskuyu-pomoshch/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/ap-bryanskoy-oblasti-soobshchila-ob-okazanii-advokatom-besplatnoy-yuridicheskoy-pomoshchi-grazhdanam/
  207. https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/advokaty-chuvashskoy-respubliki-proveli-priyem-po-pravovym-voprosam-dlya-uchastnikov-svo-i-chlenov/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/sostoyalsya-besplatnyy-priem-uchastnikov-svo-i-chlenov-ikh-semey-pri-sodeystvii-advokatov-stavropols/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/advokaty-leningradskoy-oblasti-na-strazhe-interesov-uchastnikov-svo-i-chlenov-ikh-semey/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/v-yaroslavskoy-oblasti-s-uchastiem-advokatov-proshlo-pravovoe-konsultirovanie-uchastnikov-svo/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/okazanie-pomoshchi-organizovano-na-raznykh-plozhadkakh/; htt https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/v-arkhangelske-s-uchastiem-predstaviteley-upravleniya-minyusta-rossii-upravleniya-fssp-rossii/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/pri-uchastii-advokatov-respubliki-bashkortostan-provedena-aktsiya-zashchitniki-otechestva-napravlenn/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/advokatskaya-palata-respubliki-bashkortostan-opublikovala-informatsiyu-o-prieme-grazhdan-v-sterlitam/
  208. https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/voronezhskim-advokatam-vruchili-nagrady-minyusta-rossii-za-uchastie-v-svo/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/advokatu-altayskogo-kraya-uchastniku-svo-vruchena-medal-anatoliya-koni/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/advokat-amurskoy-oblasti-uchastnik-svo-nagrazhden-medalyu-anatoliya-koni/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/advokatam-rostovskoy-oblasti-uchastnikam-svo-vrucheny-medali-anatoliya-koni/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/prezident-advokatskoy-palaty-respubliki-bashkortostan-bulat-yumadilov-prinyal-uchastie-vo-vserossiys/
  209. https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/advokat-tulskoy-oblasti-veteran-boevykh-deystviy-okazal-gumanitarnuyu-pomoshch-uchastnikam-svo/
  210. https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/predstaviteli-advokatskoy-palaty-respubliki-bashkortostan-dostavili-13-y-gumanitarnyy-gruz/
  211. https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/predstaviteli-ap-respubliki-bashkortostan-vnov-dostavili-gumanitarnyy-gruz-v-zonu-svo/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/predstaviteli-advokatskoy-palaty-respubliki-bashkortostan-v-desyatyy-raz-dostavili-gumanitarnyy-gruz/; https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/predstaviteli-ap-respubliki-bashkortostan-v-ocherednoy-raz-dostavili-gumanitarnyy-gruz-dlya-voennosl/
  212. https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/ap-chelyabinskoy-oblasti-peredala-pomoshch-voennosluzhashchim-v-zone-provedeniya/; https://t.me/initiative2018/5023
  213. https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/role_lawyers.shtml
  214. https://t.me/initiative2018/3226
  215. https://t.me/endoflaw/265
  216. https://74.ru/text/gorod/2025/04/16/75342131/
  217. https://rg.ru/2025/07/11/miniust-obnarodoval-zakonoproekt-ob-advokatskoj-monopolii.html
  218. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kak-prezident-rogachev-napryazhennost-u-yuristov-snimal-o-vstreche-advokatov-s-yuristami-v-nizhnem-novgorode; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/strah-i-nenavist-v-izmaylovo-obsuzhdenie-advokatskoy-monopolii-putem-degumanizatsii-chastnopraktikuyuschih-yuristov
  219. https://pravo.ru/review/view/40979/; https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/advokatskaya-monopoliya-kto-protiv/; https://news.rambler.ru/world/54556695-stalina-gurevich-otsenila-plany-po-vvedeniyu-v-rossii-advokatskoy-monopolii/
  220. https://www.advgazeta.ru/arhivnye-zapisi/bunt-ambarnykh-myshey/; https://www.zakonia.ru/analytics/77/52395
  221. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zayavlenie-pravleniya-mezhregionalnoy-obschestvennoy-organizatsii-advokatov-i-yuristov-initsiativa-2018-o-zakonoproekte-ob
  222. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zayavlenie-generalnogo-soveta-mezhdunarodnoy-assotsiatsii-rossiyskih-advokatov-o-proekte-zakona-o-vvedenii-advokatskoy-monopolii-v; https://slovo-zashite.org/text/odin-bolshoi-uzhasnyi-zakonoproekt
  223. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/oshibochnyy-put-rossiyskoy-advokatury-ot-instituta-grazhdanskogo-obschestva-k-instrumentu-regulirovaniya-rynka-yuridicheskih-uslug
  224. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/7989561; https://www.fontanka.ru/2025/10/20/76079185/
  225. https://law-unity.ru/
  226. https://t.me/initiative2018/3290
  227. https://t.me/initiative2018/3181
  228. https://t.me/initiative2018/3172
  229. https://law-unity.ru/razbory
  230. https://law-unity.ru/opinions; https://t.me/initiative2018/2766
  231. https://rutube.ru/video/6c9077bf5bb79f0ee41af4b1dd5121fd/
  232. https://youtu.be/wh2AIM6RzdM?si=tzaf1h6D3GeGPAxX
  233. https://t.me/initiative2018/2764
  234. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD3ZmqIQX10&t=8409s; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kruglyy-stol-v-sankt-peterburge-holodnyy-dush-dlya-popirayuschih-normy-advokatskoy-etiki-svideteley-advokatskoy-monopolii-iz; https://t.me/initiative2018/4013
  235. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kruglyy-stol-v-sankt-peterburge-holodnyy-dush-dlya-popirayuschih-normy-advokatskoy-etiki-svideteley-advokatskoy-monopolii-iz; https://gt-tomsk.ru/spread/filtr-dlya-neugodnyx-ili-zashhita-prav-lyudej/
  236. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/advokatskaya-monopoliya-razoblachenie-antinarodnoy-kontrreformy-v-stenah-parlamenta; https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8101430; https://www.rbc.ru/society/10/10/2025/68e7fdea9a794783108279c1?
  237. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/24-chasa-yuridicheskogo-soprotivleniya-itogi-pervogo-antimonopolnogo-marafona-natsionalnogo-profsoyuza-yuristov; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/24-chasa-yuridicheskogo-soprotivleniya-prodolzhenie-antimonopolnogo-marafona-natsionalnogo-profsoyuza-yuristov; https://rutube.ru/channel/42477901/
  238. https://t.me/initiative2018/3861; https://t.me/initiative2018/3862; https://t.me/initiative2018/3870; https://t.me/initiative2018/3876
  239. https://t.me/initiative2018/4727
  240. https://t.me/initiative2018/2791; https://t.me/initiative2018/3292; https://t.me/initiative2018/3319; https://t.me/initiative2018/3423; https://t.me/initiative2018/3424; https://t.me/initiative2018/3435; https://t.me/initiative2018/3516; https://t.me/initiative2018/3552; https://t.me/initiative2018/3704; https://t.me/initiative2018/3708; https://t.me/initiative2018/3709; https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8196329; https://peterburg2.ru/news/sud-v-moskve-prekratil-delo-yuristov-protiv-advokatskoy-monopolii-205071.html; https://myurist.online/news/sud-prekratil-spor-yuristov-s-minyustom-o-reforme-predstavitelstva; https://t.me/initiative2018/3834; https://t.me/initiative2018/3838; https://t.me/initiative2018/3839; https://t.me/initiative2018/3847; https://t.me/initiative2018/3860
  241. https://vk.com/wall-42591457_24469; https://t.me/initiative2018/3479
  242. https://t.me/initiative2018/3568; https://t.me/initiative2018/3886; https://t.me/initiative2018/3956
  243. https://vk.com/video-42591457_456239954
  244. https://t.me/initiative2018/3216; https://t.me/initiative2018/3322
  245. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/7989561; https://eanews.ru/ekaterinburg/20251101171842/nuzhna-li-v-rossii-advokatskaya-monopoliya-i-k-chemu-ona-privedet-mneniya-ekspertov-kruglogo-stola-ean-prostoy-vopros; https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/7926033;https://zakon.ru/blog/2025/12/5/geografiya_pravovoj_uyazvimosti_kak_regionalnaya_koncentraciya_advokatov_uglublyaet_neravenstvo_v_ro
  246. https://lenta.ru/articles/2025/08/05/advokat/; https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/7926033; https://omsk.plus.rbc.ru/news/68d4fc827a8aa9dff63ef4c3?from=from_main_13; https://tass.ru/obschestvo/25379811; https://eanews.ru/rossiya/20251101131020/ekaterinburgskiy-advokat-uslugi-yuristov-rezko-podorozhayut-iz-za-advokatskoy-monopolii
  247. https://www.dp.ru/a/2025/08/11/est-serjoznie-opasenija-advokatskaja
  248. https://bfmspb.ru/novosti/biznes-ombudsmen-kalugin-vyslushal-argumenty-za-i-protiv-advokatskoy-monopolii/
  249. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/7991778; https://tass.ru/ekonomika/25379719?ysclid=mgux8udo8p866108430
  250. https://t.me/initiative2018/4145
  251. https://www.v2b.ru/articles/advokatskaya-monopoliya-poslednie-novosti/; https://t.me/initiative2018/3777
  252. https://t.me/initiative2018/3073
  253. https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/aktsiya-zavershilas-no-rabota-tolko-nachinaetsya/; https://t.me/initiative2018/2831
  254. https://адвокаты-за.рф/
  255. https://slovo-zashite.org/text/fpa-posle-provedennogo-na-svoikh-resursakh-oprosa-o-podderzhke-advokatskoi-monopolii-otchitalas-chto-initsiativu-podderzhivaet-774-advokatov
  256. https://t.me/Talkcheev/13
  257. https://t.me/initiative2018/2849
  258. https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/sostavlen-poshagovyy-algoritm/
  259. https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/fpa-rf-obnarodovala-rezultaty-oprosa-advokatskogo-soobshchestva/
  260. https://t.me/initiative2018/3184
  261. https://t.me/initiative2018/3176
  262. https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/ryad-predlozheniy-i-zamechaniy-uchten/
  263. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zahvat-advokatury-i-presledovanie-advokatov-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii-kak-vernut-nezavisimost-advokatov-i-pravo-grazhdan-na-zaschitu
  264. https://t.me/initiative2018/3231
  265. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8059979
  266. https://t.me/initiative2018/3280
  267. https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/znachitelnaya-chast-konstruktivnykh-predlozheniy-i-zamechaniy-uchtena/
  268. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/advokatskaya-monopoliya-razoblachenie-antinarodnoy-kontrreformy-v-stenah-parlamenta; https://t.me/initiative2018/3627
  269. https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/v-advokature-deystvuyut-ottochennye-ponyatnye-i-predskazuemye-pravila/
  270. https://rg.ru/2025/10/20/zashchitnaia-reakciia.html
  271. https://zakon.ru/blog/2025/10/7/advokatskaya_monopoliya__-_plecho_federalnoj_palaty_advokatov_propagandistka_avakyan_maskiruet_zahva
  272. https://t.me/initiative2018/3420; https://t.me/initiative2018/3421
  273. https://t.me/initiative2018/3743
  274. https://t.me/initiative2018/3219
  275. https://t.me/initiative2018/3661
  276. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/brak-po-lyubvi-ili-lishenie-professii-kak-prezident-federalnoy-palaty-advokatov-otvechaet-na-kritiku-zakonoproekta-ob-advokatskoy?ysclid=mn4xyyfwsb711539139; https://zakon.ru/blog/2025/11/29/brak_po_lyubvi_ili_lishenie_professii_kak_prezident_federalnoj_palaty_advokatov_otvetila_na_kritiku__112709
  277. https://t.me/initiative2018/3887
  278. https://pravo.ru/news/260945/
  279. https://t.me/initiative2018/3996
  280. https://zakon.ru/blog/2025/10/26/po_sledam_konferencii_fap_advokatura_gosudarstvo_obschestvo_2025
  281. https://zakon.ru/blog/2025/11/14/kak_advokatskie_palaty_regionov_sdelali_yuridicheskuyu_pomosch_v_rossii_nedostupnoj_issledovanie_rek_112418; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kak-advokatskie-palaty-regionov-sdelali-yuridicheskuyu-pomosch-v-rossii-nedostupnoy-issledovanie-rekomenduemyh-stavok-gonorarov; https://zakon.ru/blog/2025/11/14/kak_advokatskie_palaty_regionov_sdelali_yuridicheskuyu_pomosch_v_rossii_nedostupnoj_issledovanie_rek_112418
  282. https://t.me/initiative2018/4075; https://www.ng.ru/politics/2025-12-04/3_9394_lawyers.html; https://rapsinews.ru/incident_news/20251225/311476612.html
  283. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/spetsializatsiya-v-advokature-novaya-spetsialnaya-operatsiya-federalnoy-palaty-advokatov-protiv-nezavisimosti-advokatskoy-professii
  284. https://t.me/initiative2018/4235
  285. https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/regular-sessions/session60/list-reports
  286. https://docs.un.org/ru/A/HRC/60/59
  287. https://t.me/initiative2018/3851
  288. https://probankrotstvo.ru/news/zakonoproekt-ob-advokatskoi-monopolii-zastoporilsia-posle-kritiki-profsoobshhestva-9585
  289. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8118466; https://rusfond.ru/society/573; https://tass.ru/obschestvo/25380115; https://ruzpp.ru/novosti/vliyanie-advokatskoj-monopolii-na-obshchestva-zashchity-prav-potrebitelej
  290. https://t.me/initiative2018/3564; https://t.me/initiative2018/4070
  291. https://t.me/initiative2018/3170; https://t.me/initiative2018/3258; https://t.me/initiative2018/3281; https://t.me/initiative2018/3311; https://t.me/initiative2018/3336; https://t.me/initiative2018/3375; https://t.me/initiative2018/3376; https://t.me/initiative2018/3413; https://t.me/initiative2018/3415; https://t.me/initiative2018/3550; https://t.me/initiative2018/3607; https://t.me/initiative2018/3621;https://t.me/initiative2018/3942; https://nta-pfo.ru/news/society/2025/news_726721/?ysclid=mh0w9iwlbu133763412
  292. https://tsargrad.tv/novost/vice-prezident-tpp-vadim-chubarov-predlozhil-otkazatsja-ot-advokatskoj-monopolii_1403042
  293. https://t.me/initiative2018/3626; https://t.me/initiative2018/3653
  294. https://www.mk.ru/social/2025/10/09/v-gosdume-raskritikovali-ideyu-advokatskoy-monopolii-privedet-k-zagnivaniyu.html; https://m.business-gazeta.ru/news/687201; https://t.me/initiative2018/3274; https://www.pnp.ru/social/deputat-poprosil-glavu-minyusta-ocenit-riski-advokatskoy-monopolii.html; https://t.me/initiative2018/3644
  295. https://t.me/initiative2018/3405; https://www.interfax.ru/russia/1052339
  296. https://www.vedomosti.ru/society/articles/2025/10/29/1150606-vvedenie-advokatskoi-monopolii-tormozitsya
  297. https://t.me/initiative2018/3962
  298. https://ppt.ru/obzory/advokatskaya-monopoliya-zamorozhena-daydzhest-reaktsiy-telegrama
  299. https://t.me/initiative2018/3261
  300. https://t.me/initiative2018/3262
  301. https://www.rbc.ru/politics/23/09/2025/68d16da09a79476972fee033
  302. https://t.me/initiative2018/3277
  303. https://t.me/initiative2018/3347; https://vk.com/video-42591457_456240015; https://t.me/initiative2018/3348; https://www.pnp.ru/social/pravo-yuristov-bez-statusa-advokata-na-dostup-k-pravosudiyu-predlozhili-zashhitit.html; https://news.rambler.ru/politics/55383516-duma-rassmotrit-proekt-zakona-lishayuschego-advokatov-monopolii-na-predstavitelstvo-v-sude/; https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8079537; https://t.me/initiative2018/3959
  304. https://t.me/initiative2018/4386; https://t.me/initiative2018/4653
  305. https://t.me/initiative2018/3359
  306. https://t.me/initiative2018/2783; https://t.me/initiative2018/4508; https://t.me/initiative2018/4506; https://t.me/initiative2018/4547
  307. https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadPublicCommunicationFile?gId=30470; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pismo-s-utverzhdeniyami-o-narusheniyah-ot-spetsialnogo-dokladchika-oon-po-voprosu-o-nezavisimosti-sudey-i-advokatov-rabochey-gruppy
  308. https://www.gazeta.ru/social/news/2025/10/29/27055580.shtml; https://alrf.ru/news/zakonoproekt-ob-advokatskoy-monopolii-zastoporilsya-posle-kritiki-profsoobshchestva/; https://t.me/initiative2018/3731; https://t.me/initiative2018/3798; https://t.me/initiative2018/4452
  309. https://t.me/initiative2018/4519
  310. https://fparf.ru/news/law-chambers/v-pervuyu-ochered-oni-advokaty/
  311. https://fparf.ru/polemic/opinions/osoznannyy-vybor-v-polzu-bolee-vysokogo-urovnya-otvetstvennosti-kompetentnosti-i-eticheskoy-distsipl/
  312. https://www.vedomosti.ru/society/articles/2026/04/08/1188670-minyust-prodolzhit-prorabativat-initsiativu-s-advokatskoi-monopoliei
  313. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zahvat-advokatury-i-presledovanie-advokatov-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii-kak-vernut-nezavisimost-advokatov-i-pravo-grazhdan-na-zaschitu
    314. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8725900
    315. https://realnoevremya.ru/news/401291-sud-vynes-prigovoril-kazanskogo-advokata-innu-barlevu-k-shtrafu-200-tysyach

Index

РИНЦ


Импакт-фактор российских научных журналов