NEWS
Интервью с членом Совета Федеральной палаты адвокатов Российской Федерации, Президентом Адвокатской палаты Республики Башкортостан Б.Г. Юмадиловым.: Интервью с Председателем Президиума Саратовской специализированной коллегии адвокатов, заслуженным юристом Российской Федерации, кандидатом юридических наук, профессором Н.П. Царевой: Интервью с доктором юридических наук, профессором, председателем Научно-консультативного и экспертного Совета Гильдии российских адвокатов, членом Научно-консультативного Совета Федеральной палаты адвокатов РФ, членом Научно-консультативного Совета при Ве: Интервью с вице-президентом Федеральной палаты адвокатов Российской Федерации С.И. Володиной: Интервью с доктором юридических наук, профессором, президентом Гильдии российских адвокатов, ректором Российской академии адвокатуры и нотариата Гасаном Борисовичем Мирзоевым:











RUS ENG
EVENTS
Statement «Оn Mass Detentions and Searches Against Lawyers»

An Appeal for a Preventive Action – the Universal Temporary Universal Termination of the Participation of Lawyers in Procedural Actions in All Types of Legal Proceedings

Statement «On the Appeal By Lawyers On the Issue of All-Russian Preventive Action in the Form of Temporary Universal Termination of the Participation of Lawyers in Procedural Actions in All Types of Legal Proceedings and the Statement of the Federal Chamber of Lawyers of the Russian Federation»

Statement «On Inadmissibility of Suppression of Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Expression in Lawyer Profession»

Statement «On Introducing the Possibility of Lawyer`S Disbarment When the Fact of His Departure for Permanent Residence Or for a Period of More Than One Year Outside The Russian Federation Is Revealed»

PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND ADVOCACY PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Advocates as agents of public financial control in the field of anti-money laundering and the financing of terrorism
ANTROPTSEVA Irina Olegovna
Ph.D., Associate Professor at the Department of Legal Support for the Market Economy of The School of Law of Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
119571, Moscow, pr. Vernadsky, 82, bld. 1, Russian Federation
Abstract: The article considers the obligation of lawyers to use internal control in the sphere of combating money laundering and terrorism financing from the point of view of their involvement in the implementation of public financial control as a subject that has a special status due to the specifics of its activities. The use of the risk-oriented approach at different levels of public financial control in combating money laundering is aimed at reducing financial crime and losses in financial sphere, increasing the efficiency of public financial control.
Keywords: advocate, anti-money laundering, public financial control, risk-oriented approach
References
1.Anisimov V.F., Rudik O.S. Problemy` realizacii advokatskoj tajny` pri protivodejstvii legalizacii (otmy`vaniyu) denezhny`x sredstv // Advokatskaya praktika. 2013. № 2. S. 2–5.
2.Shashkova A.V. Uchastie advokata v provedenii finansovo-pravovoj ocenki pri protivodejstvii legalizacii nezakonny`x doxodov // Advokat. 2011. № 7. S. 11–16.
3.Shigurov A.V. Trebovaniya zakonodatel`stva o protivodejstvii legalizacii (otmy`vaniyu) doxodov, poluchen-ny`x prestupny`m putem, i finansirovaniyu terrorizma k advokatskoj deyatel`nosti: problema pravovogo regulirovaniya // Advokatskaya praktika. 2018. № 4. S. 50–55.
4.Yadrixinskij S.A. Princip prioriteta publichny`x interesov v finansovoj deyatel`nosti gosudarstva: poisk kompromissa // Aktual`ny`e problemy` rossijskogo prava. 2020. № 1. S. 62–71.

ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Features of the use of digital resources, blockchain technology and smart contracts in binding legal relations with the participants of non-profit organizations
PATLAENKO Aleksandr Petrovich
Postgraduate Student of the Moscow Financial and Industrial University «Synergy», executive Director of «Agrokabel Plant» LLC
129090, Moscow, Meshchanskaya str., 9/14, p. 1, Russian Federation
Abstract: The purpose of the study is to establish the specifics of the use of digital resources, blockchain technology and smart contracts in binding legal relations with the participants of non-profit organizations, identify problematic issues and propose ways to resolve them.
The methodological foundation of this scientific article is both the general scientific method of legal cognition of digital reality, and special methods of synthesis and analogy, formal logic, comparative law and others, including private scientific methods aimed at the formation of knowledge regarding the features of the use of digital resources and platforms in the activities of non-profit organizations.
The author comes to the conclusion that despite the emergence of legal regulation in many areas related to the digitalization of economic relations, the rapid adaptation of the commercial sector to the rapid changes in economic relations, the process of adaptation of non-profit organizations to the existing new technological realities is quite slow. Non–profit organizations, in addition to the legal basis for operating in changing conditions, as the study showed, need to gradually introduce digital technologies into their activities, acquire the necessary skills and personnel to work in this area, other technical components, and, importantly, financing. We are convinced that non-profit organizations should switch to the use of modern tools in their activities in order to work effectively.
It is concluded that one of the characteristic advantages of using blockchain is to reduce operating costs and accelerate the flow of funds in the activities of non-profit organizations. That is, due to the use of this technology, they will be delivered to recipients in an accelerated mode, which is quite important when providing assistance in connection with a serious health condition, when it is critically important.
The article is characterized by sufficient originality and has value, because the essential features of the implementation of digital resources in the field of obligations of non-profit organizations, blockchain technologies are determined. It is determined that the process of digitalization of the entire economic turnover is currently underway, modern technologies are being introduced that have a direct impact on the development of public relations, well-established, traditional legal institutions are being transformed, in particular, the status of non-profit organizations. It should be recognized that, unfortunately, Russian legislation currently does not fully meet the challenges of effective use of digital technology opportunities within the framework of non-profit organizations, despite the fact that this area of legal regulation will largely determine the prospects for further development of digital legal relations.
Keywords: digitalization, commitment, blockchain technologies, digital resources, blockchain technologies, legal relations, non-profit organizations, smart contracts
References
1.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 31.07.2020 № 259-FZ «O cifrovy`x finansovy`x aktivax, cifrovoj valyute i o vnesenii izmenenij v otdel`ny`e zakonodatel`ny`e akty` Rossijskoj Federacii» // Sobranie zakonodatel`stva RF. 2020. № 31. Ch. I. St. 5018.
2.Rasporyazhenie Pravitel`stva RF ot 30.09.2018 № 2101-r «Ob utverzhdenii kompleksnogo plana modernizacii i rasshireniya magistral`noj infrastruktury` na period do 2024 goda» // Sobranie zakonodatel`stva RF. 2018. № 42.Ch. II. St. 6480.
3.Bulgakov I.T. Pravovy`e voprosy` ispol`zovaniya texnologii blokchejn // Zakon. 2016. № 12. S. 80–89.
4.Dobry`e bitkoiny` i Big Data: kak NKO ispol`zuyut cifrovy`e instrumenty` [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.forbes.ru/forbeslife/402205-dobrye-bitkoiny-i-big-data-kak-nko-ispolzuyut-cifrovye-instrumenty.
5.Iriskina E.N. Pravovy`e aspekty` primeneniya texno-logii blokchejn i ispol`zovaniya smart-kontraktov: magisterskaya dissertaciya. Tomskij gosudarstvenny`j universitet, 2019.
6.Kak cifrovy`e aktivy` razvivayut blagotvoritel`nost` (2 dekabrya 2019 g.) [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5d39a870e6cb9b00ad2c6c63/kak-cifrovye-aktivy-razvivaiut-blagotvoritelnost-5de43f843d873600aeeedad4.
7.Karczxiya A.A. Grazhdansko-pravovaya model` regulirovaniya cifrovy`x texnologij: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2019.
8.Levushkin A.N., Tyulin A.V. Deepfake i sistemy` iskusstvennogo intellekta v paradigme razvitiya cifrovogo prava // Yurist. 2021. № 11. S. 19–24.
9.Levushkin A.N. Special`ny`e dogovorny`e konstrukcii: ramochny`j, opcionny`j i abonentskij dogovory` // Aktual`ny`e problemy` rossijskogo prava. 2018. № 2. S. 19–26.
10.Nedorezkov V.V. Kriptovalyuty` na baze texnologii blokchejna: problemy` pravovogo regulirovaniya // Bankovskoe pravo. 2017. № 4. S. 45–49.
11.Novoselova L.A. O pravovoj prirode bitkojna // Xozyajstvo i pravo. 2017. № 9. S. 3–16.
12.Savel`ev A.I. Dogovornoe pravo 2.0: «umny`e» kontrakty` kak nachalo koncza klassicheskogo dogovornogo prava // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2016. № 3. S. 32–60.
13.https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/svyazanny`j_spisok.
14.Tereshhenko L., Starodubova O. Zagadki informacionnogo prava // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2017. № 7. S. 156–161.
15.Xabrieva T.Ya., Chernogor N.N. Pravo v usloviyax cifrovoj real`nosti // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2018. № 1. S. 85–102.
16.About Open-Source Licenses // Open-Source Initiative. – Electronic data. [S. l.], 2012 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://opensource.org/licenses.
17.Rich Apodaca. Six Things Bitcoin Users Should Know about Private Keys // Bitzuma, 2017 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://bitzuma.com/posts/six-things-bitcoin-users-should-know-aboutprivate-keys.

ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Criteria for international recognition of research results conducted in domestic forensic organizations
ANTILEVSKAYA Julia Alexandrovna
Ph. D. Student of the Faculty of Law, Lomonosov Moscow State University, lawyer of the Federal Budgetary Healthcare Institution «Information and Methodological Center» of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare, technical expert of the Federal Accreditation Service
119991, Moscow, st. Leninskie Gory, 1, building 13, 4th educational building, Russian Federation
Abstract: The article is devoted to the problem of developing criteria for international recognition of the results of research conducted in domestic forensic organizations. In the era of globalization, the issue of international recognition of the results of forensic research is becoming particularly relevant. The lack of unified criteria for the recognition of the results of forensic examinations gives rise to a number of problems affecting international cooperation. The problems affect a variety of methodological approaches, legal aspects, creating barriers to effective interaction of international bodies in the field of justice, and may also lead to the fact that the results of research from some countries may not be recognized in others. The author has formulated proposals for defining criteria for international recognition of the results of research conducted in domestic forensic organizations. The scientific and practical significance lies in the attempt to form universal criteria for the recognition of the results of research conducted in domestic forensic organizations in the context of advanced international concepts and trends in the development of forensic expertise in the near future.
Keywords: accreditation, validation, verification, qualification, competence, method, methodological support, accreditation body, competence assessment, forensic expert, forensic science, forensic science activities, standardization, quality assurance, quality control
References
1.Arbitrazh, sport i doping: Sbornik nekotory`x reshenij Disciplinarnoj komissii MOK, Sportivnogo arbitrazhnogo suda (Lozanna), analiticheskix i informacionny`x materialov v svyazi s dopingovy`mi delami rossijskix sportsmenov i funkcionerov. M.: Associaciya issledovatelej mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo i sravnitel`nogo prava, 2020.
2.Otkry`ty`j dialog: sudebno-e`kspertnoe obespechenie zashhity` rossijskix sportsmenov pered disciplinarnoj komissiej MOK i v Sportivnom arbitrazhnom sude [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.sudexpert.ru/news/opendial.php.
3.Smirnova S.A., Omel`yanyuk G.G. Opy`t primeneniya sudebno-e`kspertny`x znanij po delam, svyazanny`m s narusheniem antidopingovy`x pravil // Sport v nacional`no-pravovom i mezhdunarodno-pravovom izmerenii: aktual`-ny`e problemy`: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoj nauch-no-prakticheskoj konferencii (Moskva, 4 aprelya 2018 g.) / pod red. T.Ya. Xabrievoj. Institut zakonodatel`stva i sravnitel`nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel`stve RF. M., 2019. S. 170–174.
4.19th INTERPOL International Forensic Science (Managers Symposium, Lyon, France, 7–10 October 2019) // Review Papers [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.interpol.int/content/download/14458/file/Interpol%20Review%20Papers%202019.pdf.
5.Alfaro C.R., Madrigal G.B., Hernandez M.C. Improving forensic processes performance: A Lean Six Sigma approach // Forensic Science International: Synergy, 2 (2020), P. 90–94 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.02.001.
6.De Kinder J., Pirée H. The future of the forensic science providers – time to re-think our structures? Forensic Sci. Int. 2020;316 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110471.
7.Delgado Y., Price B.S., Speaker P.J., Stoiloff S.L. Forensic intelligence: data analytics as the bridge between forensic science and investigation. Forensic Sci. Int.: Synergy. 2021; 3 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100162.
8.Dror I.E., Pierce M.L. ISO Standards Addressing Issues of Bias and Impartiality in Forensic Work [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3512032.
9.European Network of Forensic Science Institutes ENFSI. 2022. Annual Report 2021 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/ENFSI_Annual_Report_2021_WEB.pdf.
10.European Network of Forensic Science Institutes ENFSI Annual report 2020. 2021 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/ENFSI_Annual_Report_2020_WEB.pdf.
11.Houck M.M., Speaker P. Project FORESIGHT: A ten-year retrospective // Forensic Science International: Synergy. V. 2 (2020) P. 275–281 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.08.005.
12.Interpol questioned documents review 2019–2022 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100300.
13.Love J.C., Langley N.R. Exploring educational needs beyond technical competency: laboratory management, court testimony, and vicarious trauma. Forensic Anthropol. 2020;3(2):82–90 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: doi: 10.5744/fa.2020.3003.
14.Mejia R., Cuellar M., Salyards J. Implementing blind proficiency testing in forensic laboratories: Motivation, obstacles, and recommendations // Forensic Science International: Synergy. V. 2. 2020. P. 293–298 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.09.002.
15.Melbourn H., Smith G., McFarland J., Rogers M., Wieland K., DeWilde D., Lighthart S., Quinn M., Baxter A., Quarino L. Mandatory certification of forensic science practitioners in the United States: a supportive perspective. Forensic Sci. Int.: Synergy. 2021;1:161–169 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.08.001.
16.Sathyaprakasan R., Govindan P., Alvi S., Sadath L., Sharon Ph., Singh N. An Implementation of Blockchain Technology in Forensic Evidence Management // International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Knowledge Economy (ICCIKE), March 17–18, 2021, Amity University Dubai, UAE [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: DOI: 10.1109/ICCIKE51210.2021.9410791.
17.Speaker P.J. An independent evaluation of laboratory staffing needs: launching the forensic laboratory workforce calculator. Forensic Sci. Int.: Synergy. 2021;3 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100137.
18.Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward // U.S. Department of Justice. [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228091.pdf.
19.Wang Z., MacMillan K., Powell M., Wein L.M. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the number of samples to collect and test from a sexual assault. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117(24):13421–13427 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.pnas.org/content/117/24/13421.
20.William P. McAndrew, Max M. Houck. Interpol review of forensic science management literature 2016–2019 // Forensic Science International: Synergy. V. 2. 2020. P. 382–388 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.007.
21.Xiaodan He, Chengtao Li (2022). Development of forensic standards in China: a review, Forensic Sciences Research, 7:1, 1-10 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: DOI: 10.1080/20961790.2021.1912877.
22.Yukama E., Pragiwani M., Suriawinata I.S. Effect of the employee recruitment process, quality of human resources and work motivation on employees performance at Indonesian police criminal investigation agency, forensic laboratory centre. Indonesian J. Busin. Account. Manag. 2020;3(2):104–109 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://ejournal.stei.ac.id/index.php/IJBAM.
23.Vision of the European Forensic Science Area 2030 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Vision-of-the-European-Forensic-Science-Area-2030.pdf.

ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
English experience of judicial protection of the business reputation of a legal entity
BYCHKOV Sergey Vitalievich
Lawyer of the Moscow Bar Association «Zhorin and Partners», Postgraduate Candidate for the Degree of Candidate of Sciences of the Department of Civil and Business Law of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
121099, Moscow, Pogodinskaya str., 4, Russian Federation
Abstract: The article examines the ways to protect the business reputation of a legal entity. The similarity of protection mechanisms in Russian and foreign law for this group of public relations is highlighted. The significance of the work lies in the fact that in it the author comes to conclusions about the unity of possible violations of personal (non-property) rights of persons (including legal entities) in different legal systems, which determines the similarity in legal regulation of ways to protect such rights, as well as the established legal regulation of the protection of business reputation in Russia in accordance with generally accepted at the world level, standards in the field of public relations under consideration.
Keywords: business reputation, defamation, false and defamatory information, legal entity, anglo-american legal system, civil law legal system
References
1.Arslanov K.M. Konvergenciya rossijskogo i germanskogo opy`ta grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya: istoriya, sovremennost` i perspektiva: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2020. S. 610.
2.Arxiereev N.V. Zashhita delovoj reputacii yuridi-cheskix licz v inostranny`x pravovy`x sistemax // Biznes, menedzhment i pravo. 2014. № 2 (30). S. 138–144.
3.Dzhura V.V. Diffamacionny`e spory`: sravnitel`no-pravovoj analiz // Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik. 2016. № 3. S. 135–146.
4.Konvenciya o zashhite prav cheloveka i osnovny`x svobod [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.coe.int/ru/web/compass/the-european-convention-on-human-rights-and-its-protocols.
5.Korolevskij advokat Gaj Vassal-Adams. Korporativny`e istcy v klevete. Ch. 2. (Zakon o diffamacii 2013 g. i ego vliyanie) [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.matrixlaw.co.uk/resource/corporate-claimants-in-libel-part-2-the-defamation-act-2013-and-its-impact-by-guy-vassall-adams-qc/.
6.David J. Acheson Corporate reputation under the European Convention on Human Rights // Journal of Media Law. 2018. 10 (1). P. 49–76.
7.Murnaghan, Francis D. Jr Ave Defamation, Atque Vale Libel and Slander // University of Baltimore Law Review. 1976. № 6 (1). P. 27–43.
8.Peter Coe and James Brown What’s in a Name? The Case for Protecting the Reputation of Businesses under Article 1 Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights // Journal of European Tort Law. 2020. № 10 (3). P. 286–315.
9.Ron Moscona, Alyce Kelly Defamation Claims in UK Require Proof of «Serious Harm» // Dorsey & Whitney LLP. 2019. № 7. P. 14–31.

ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Subsidiary liability of controlling persons in the context of the principle of legal certainty
PETUKHOV Sergey Vladimirovich1, RACHEEVA Yulia Vladimirovna2
1Postgraduate Student of the Faculty of Law of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
125993, Moscow, Leningradsky ave., 49, Russian Federation
2Magistrature Student of the Faculty of Law of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
125993, Moscow, Leningradsky ave., 49, Russian Federation
Abstract: The purpose of the article is to investigate the exclusivity of subsidiary liability of controlling persons. As a result, the authors come to the conclusion that exclusivity implies the use of this institution only in the absence of alternative ways to protect the rights and legitimate interests of creditors, as well as in compliance with the rules of protection of business decisions.
Keywords: subsidiary responsibility of controlling persons, exclusivity, extraordinary, ways to protect rights, protection of business decisions
References
1.Arakelov S.A., Chekmy`shev K.N., Soldaten-
kov V.Yu. Institut subsidiarnoj otvetstvennosti kak novy`j faktor e`konomicheskogo razvitiya // Vestnik e`konomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossijskoj Federacii. 2018. № 4. S. 146–158.
2.Permyakov O.V. Perexod subsidiarnoj otvetstvennosti po nasledstvu: nekotory`e problemy` i vozmozhny`e resheniya // Imushhestvenny`e otnosheniya v Rossijskoj Federacii. 2022. № 8. S. 62–69.
3.Parxomenko A.D. Subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost` kak mexanizm protivodejstviya zloupotrebleniyu konstrukciej yuridicheskogo licza // Rossijskij sud`ya. 2022. № 5. S. 21–24.
4.Dzhegolya I.V. Subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost` kontroliruyushhix licz za nevozmozhnost` polnogo pogasheniya trebovanij kreditorov: kakovy` granicy? // Pravo i biznes. 2021. № 2. S. 48–53.
5.Filipenko N.V. Vnebankrotnaya subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost` licz, kontrolirovavshix obshhestvo s ogranichennoj otvetstvennost`yu // Arbitrazhny`e spory`. 2023. № 1. S. 38–69.
6.Gorbashev I.V. O nekotory`x material`no-pravovy`x aspektax privlecheniya k subsidiarnoj otvetstvennosti v raz``yasneniyax VS RF // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2018. № 4. S. 154–202.
 
HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Implementation of constitutional guarantees of social rights and freedoms of man and citizen by public authorities in the digital environment
BORISOVA Nina Olegovna
Postgraduate Student of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law of Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
420008, Kazan, Kremlevskaya str., 18, Russian Federation
Abstract: With the development of the information society and digitalization processes in the implementation of constitutional social rights and citizens, the issues of guarantees of these rights in the digital environment are becoming particularly relevant. In these conditions, it becomes natural and necessary to study the constitutional rights of citizens and their guarantees in the process of introducing the latest information and communication systems in public authorities. The author of the article highlights the main legislative initiatives in the framework of the implementation of constitutional guarantees of social rights and freedoms of man and citizen in the digital environment.
Keywords: constitutional guarantees, citizen, digital technologies, constitutional rights, labor rights
References
1.Ministerstvo cifrovogo razvitiya, svyazi i massovy`x kommunikacij Rossijskoj Federacii [E`lektron-ny`j resurs]. URL: https://digital.gov.ru/ru/activity/directions/858/?utm_referrer=https%3a%2f%2fwww.google.ru%2f.
2.Ob utverzhdenii Perechnya MSZU v sub``ektax RF [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://base.garant.ru/403184322/.
3.Rasporyazhenie Pravitel`stva RF ot 31.10.2022 № 3268-r «Ob utverzhdenii Strategii razvitiya stroitel`noj otrasli i zhilishhno-kommunal`nogo xozyajstva Rossijskoj Federacii na period do 2030 goda s prognozom do 2035 goda» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_430333/f62ee45faefd8e2a11d6d88941ac66824f848bc2/.
4.Federal`ny`j zakon «O provedenii e`ksperimenta po ustanovleniyu special`nogo nalogovogo rezhima «Nalog na professional`ny`j doxod» ot 27.11.2018 № 422-FZ (poslednyaya redakciya ot 28.06.2022 № 206-FZ) [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_311977/.
5.Ministerstvo yusticii Respubliki Tatarstan [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://minjust.tatarstan.ru/nalogi.htm?pub_id=1708233.htm.
6.Federal`naya nalogovaya sluzhba RF [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn77/news/activities_fts/11248671/.
7.Putin obyazal organy` vlasti sozdat` oficial`ny`e stranicy v soczsetyax [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://ria.ru/20220714/sotsseti-1802411783.html.
8.Federal`ny`j proekt «Sozdanie edinogo cifrovogo kontura v zdravooxranenii na osnove edinoj gosudarstvennoj informacionnoj sistemy` v sfere zdravooxraneniya (EGISZ)» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://minzdrav.gov.ru/poleznye-resursy/natsproektzdravoohranenie/tsifra.
9.Prikaz Minkomsvyazi Rossii ot 01.03.2013 № 38 «Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya ob avtomatizirovannoj informacionnoj sisteme «Federal`ny`j telefonny`j centr sbora mnenij grazhdan o kachestve gosudarstvenny`x uslug» (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 11.04.2013 № 28117) [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_145133/.
10.Sajt «Vash kontrol`» pereshel na avtorizaciyu pol`zovatelej cherez ESIA [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://d-russia.ru/sajt-vash-kontrol-pereshel-na-avtorizatsiyu-polzovatelej-cherez-esia.html.

HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
To the question of the role of the commissioner for the protection of the rights of entrepreneurs in the settlement of disputes
SAVOSTYANOVA Svetlana Alexandrovna
Ph.D., Associate professor of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
105187, Moscow, Shcherbakovskaya, 38, Russian Federation
Abstract: The article considers the interaction of the Commissioner for the Protection of the Rights of Entrepreneurs with various state bodies and his role in settling disputes. The author comes to the conclusion that the most effective dispute resolution is carried out in joint interaction with the prosecutor's office.
Keywords: Commissioner for the protection of the rights of entrepreneurs, dispute, annual report of the Commissioner for the rights of entrepreneurs, protection of violated rights, the role of the prosecutor's office
References
1.Federal`ny`j konstitucionny`j zakon ot 26.02.1997 № 1-FKZ (red. ot 29.05.2023) «Ob Upolnomochennom po pravam cheloveka v Rossijskoj Federacii» // SZ RF. 1997. № 9. St. 1011.
2.Konstituciya Rossijskoj Federacii 1993 goda (s izmeneniyami, odobrenny`mi v xode obshherossijskogo golosovaniya 01.07.2020).
3.Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 22.06.2012 № 879 «Ob Upolnomochennom pri Prezidente Rossijskoj Federacii po zashhite prav predprinimatelej» // SZ RF. 2012. № 26. St. 3509.
4.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 07.05.2013 № 78-FZ (red. ot 29.12.2022) «Ob upolnomochenny`x po zashhite prav predprinimatelej v Rossijskoj Federacii» // SZ RF. 2013. № 19. St. 2305.
5.Zakon Moskovskoj oblasti ot 13.01.2014 № 1/2014-OZ (red. ot 08.11.2021) «Ob upolnomochennom po zashhite prav predprinimatelej v Moskovskoj oblasti i o vnesenii izmeneniya v Zakon Moskovskoj oblasti «O denezhnom soderzhanii licz, zameshhayushhix gosudarstvenny`e dolzhnosti Moskovskoj oblasti i dolzhnosti gosudarstvennoj grazhdanskoj sluzhby` Moskovskoj oblasti» // Ezhednevny`e Novosti. Podmoskov`e. 2014. № 9.
6.Lilikova O.S. Institut Upolnomochennogo po zashhite prav predprinimatelej v Rossii: pravovy`e problemy` // Bezopasnost` biznesa. 2022. № 6. S. 10–15.
7.Ezhegodny`j doklad upolnomochennogo po pravam predprinimatelej [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: ___2022.pdf/https://uzpp.mosreg.ru/download/document/14379774.
8.Zajkov D.E. Upolnomochenny`e po zashhite prav predprinimatelej kak uchastniki arbitrazhnogo processa // Bezopasnost` biznesa. 2019. № 6. S. 9–13.
9.Belov V.E. Upolnomochenny`e po zashhite prav predprinimatelej: rol` i mesto v sisteme zashhity` prav uchastnikov publichny`x zakupok // Zakony` Rossii: opy`t, analiz, praktika. 2020. № 4. S. 51–56.
10.Postanovlenie Pravitel`stva RF ot 26.12.2018 № 1680 «Ob utverzhdenii obshhix trebovanij k organizacii i osushhestvleniyu organami gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora), organami municipal`nogo kontrolya meropriyatij po profilaktike narushenij obyazatel`ny`x trebovanij, trebovanij, ustanovlenny`x municipal`ny`mi pravovy`mi aktami» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://government.ru/docs/all/120213/.
11.Doklad Prezidentu RF – 2023 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://doklad.ombudsmanbiz.ru/doklad_2023.html.
12.Prikaz Mine`konomrazvitiya Rossii ot 23.12.2022 № 733 «Ob utverzhdenii metodicheskix rekomendacij po vnedreniyu poryadka provedeniya ocenki reguliruyushhego vozdejstviya i poryadka provedeniya procedury` ocenki primeneniya obyazatel`ny`x trebovanij i e`kspertizy` v sub``ektax Rossijskoj Federacii» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://mii.mosreg.ru/deyatelnost/ocenka-reguliruyushchego-vozdeystviya/normativno-pravovaya-baza.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
On the problem of the evaluation category of some criminal legal and criminological signs of fake information in the context of modern threats
AKIMENKO Marina Alekseevna
Ph.D., Associate Professor of the Department of International Law, Justice and Law Enforcement of the Law Institute of the Pyatigorsk State University
357501, Pyatigorsk, Kalinina pr., 9, Russian Federation
Abstract: This article discusses some criminological features characteristic of fake information distributed through various media. In the context of modern threats, the study of various aspects of this type of information is quite relevant. Analysis of these aspects will allow us to develop more effective measures to prevent and combat this type of crime.
Keywords: information, fake, Internet, law
References
1.Obzor po otdel`ny`m voprosam sudebnoj praktiki, svyazanny`m s primeneniem zakonodatel`stva i mer po protivodejstviyu rasprostraneniyu na territorii Rossijskoj Federacii novoj koronavirusnoj infekcii (COVID-19) № 2 (utv. Prezidiumom Verxovnogo Suda RF 30 aprelya 2020 g.). Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoj sistemy` «Garant».
2.Psixologicheskie osobennosti fejkovoj informacii [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://ludirosta.ru/post/psikhologicheskie-osobennosti-feykovoy-informatsii_2723.
3.Global Digital 2022: vy`shel ezhegodny`j otchyot ob internete i social`ny`x setyax – glavny`e cifry` [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.sostav.ru/publication/we-are-social-i-hootsuite-52472.html.
4.Kiberviktimologiya fejka: pervichnoe dos`e // Vestnik Tom. gos. un-ta. 2021. № 471 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kiberviktimologiya-feyka-pervichnoe-dosie.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Criminalization and decriminalization of acts as one of the directions of implementation of the principle of justice
NIFTALIEVA Irina Alisalamovna
Ph.D., Senior Lecturer of the Department of Criminal Law of the Educational and Scientific Complex for Preliminary Investigation in the Internal Affairs Bodies of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
400075, Volgograd, st. Historical, 130, Russian Federation
Abstract: The author identifies the requirements for justice in the formation of the circle of crimes, the most important of which is the compliance of this process with objective reality and the national interests of the state.
Keywords: justice, principle, criminalization, decriminalization, social realities
References
1.Tret`yakov V.I., Strilecz O.V. Realizaciya principa spravedlivosti na sovremennom e`tape razvitiya rossijskogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel`stva // Vestnik Volgogradskoj akademii MVD Rossii. 2018. № 4 (47). S. 9–13.
2.Niftalieva I.A. Princip spravedlivosti v ugolovnom prave: problemy` realizacii v zakonodatel`stve i pravoprimeni-tel`noj praktike: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2022.
3.Rossijskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshhaya i osobennaya chasti: uchebnik: v 3 t. / pod red. N.A. Lopashenko. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Yurlitinform, 2014.
4.Polny`j kurs ugolovnogo prava: v 5 t. / pod red. A.I. Korobeeva. SPb.: Yurid. centr Press, 2008. T. 1.
5.Shesler A.V. Kriminalizaciya i dekriminalizaciya kak napravleniya pravotvorcheskoj politiki // Trudy` Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. 2018. № 2 (46). S. 136–141.
6.Prozumentov L.M. Kriminologicheskie usloviya kriminalizacii i dekriminalizacii deyanij // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 4 (6). S. 56–62.
7.O vnesenii izmenenij v stat`yu 230 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii i stat`yu 151 Ugolovno-processual`nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii: poyasnit. zapiska k proektu Federal`nogo zakona // Sistema obespecheniya zakonodatel`noj deyatel`nosti. [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/986128-7.
8.Traxov A.I., Beshukova Z.M. Rasprostranenie zavedomo lozhnoj informacii (st. 207.1 i 207.2 UK RF): novy`e sostavy` prestuplenij s priznakom publichnosti // Teoriya i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitiya. 2020. № 6 (148). S. 78–82.
9.O Strategii nacional`noj bezopasnosti Rossijskoj Federacii: Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 02.07.2021 № 400. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus».
10.Chepunov O.I., Dogadajlo E.Yu. Nacional`ny`e prioritety` Rossijskoj Federacii v sovremenny`x e`konomicheskix usloviyax: k probleme konstitucionno-pravovoj zashhity` // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya «Yurisprudenciya». 2018. № 1. S. 79–89.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Law Enforcement Practice of Qualification of Fraud in Real Estate
STRELNIKOV Pyotr Alexandrovich1, TARBA Ekaterina Romanovna2
1Assistant to the Head of the GAP PJSC «Rostelecom» in Moscow, Student of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
125167, Moscow, Leningradsky Ave., 49/2, Russian Federation
2Assistant Director of JSC «TZB-Soyuz», Student of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Fede-ration
125167, Moscow, Leningradsky Ave., 49/2, Russian Federation
Abstract: The issues of qualification are studied, the main ways of committing fraudulent actions with real estate are considered, several examples of judicial practice are given. Mechanisms aimed at counteracting fraud in real estate transactions are defined, as well as recommendations on ways to prevent this type of crime are given.
Keywords: fraud, crime, real estate, transaction, qualification, Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, property right, damage
References
1.Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (chast` pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ (red. ot 29.12.2022) (s izm. i dop. ot 06.08.2021). Dostup iz spravochnoj pravovoj sistemy` «Garant».
2.Ugolovny`j kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 14.04.2023) // Sobranie zakonodatel`stva Rossijskoj Federacii. 1996. 17 iyunya.
3.Postanovlenie Plenuma Verxovnogo Suda RF ot 30.11.2017 № 48 (red. ot 15.12.2022) «O sudebnoj praktike po delam o moshennichestve, prisvoenii i rastrate».
4.Portal pravovoj statistiki General`noj prokuratury` RF [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://crimestat.ru/analytics.
5.Batyukova V.E. O pravoprimenitel`noj praktike moshennichestva v sfere nedvizhimosti // Zakon i pravo. 2021. № 4 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-pravoprimenitelnoy-praktike-moshennichestva-v-sfere-nedvizhimosti.
6.Belov E.V. Ob obyazatel`ny`x priznakax sub``ektivnoj storony` moshennichestva s nedvizhimost`yu v zhilishhnoj sfere // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2010. № 12. S. 59–61.
7.Kadnikov N.G., Belov E.V., Kadnikov B.N. K voprosu o priznakax moshennichestva, povlekshego lishenie grazhdanina prava na zhiloe pomeshhenie // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2016. № 7.
8.Parfenov M.R. K voprosu kriminologicheskogo analiza moshennichestva v sfere oborota nedvizhimosti kak metodo-logicheskoj osnovy` formirovaniya sistemy` ego preduprezhdeniya // Sovremenny`j ucheny`j. 2021. № 3. S. 285–289.
9.Parfenov M.R. K voprosu opredeleniya predmeta xishheniya pri moshennichestve v sfere oborota nedvizhimosti. 2021. № 4(79). S. 29–31.
10.Kirovskij rajonny`j sud g. Rostova-na-Donu. Ugolovnoe delo № 1-17/2017 (1-153/2016;) // GAS «Pravosudie» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://bsr.sudrf.ru/.
11.Prigovor № 1-55/2019 1-846/2018 ot 9 yanvarya 2019 g. po delu № 1-55/2019 Sterlitamakskogo gorodskogo suda Respubliki Bashkortostan [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/qUU9GpaCbRoh/?regular-txt=Ershova+s+r&regular-case_doc=&regular-lawchunkinfo=&regular-date_from=&regular-date_to=&regular-workflow_stage=&regular-area=&regular-court=&regular-judge=&_=1683065089602&snippet_pos=134#snippet.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Problems of regulation and implementation of criminal liability for crimes in the field of debt financing
BINYAMINOV Binyamin Albertovich
Postgraduate Student of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology of All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
117638, Moscow, Azovskaya str., 2, building 1, Russian Federation
Abstract: The aim of the work is to develop possible options for improving the legislative regulation of criminal liability for crimes in the field of debt financing. The methods of dialectics, modeling and the formal legal method are applied. In this article, the author highlights the problems of regulation and implementation of criminal liability for crimes in the field of debt financing. In the course of this study, the author formulated proposals for introducing amendments to the criminal legislation aimed at improving the regulation of liability for crimes in the field of debt financing.
Keywords: Debt financing, fraud, criminal liability, syndicated lending, fraud
References
1.Binyaminov A.Yu. Obman kak sposob soversheniya prestupleniya v rossijskom ugolovnom prave // Zakon i pravo. 2022. № 5. S. 116–119.
2.Binyaminov B.A., Chuprova A.Yu. Ugolovno-pravovy`e sredstva zashhity` sindicirovannogo kredita // Problemy` e`konomiki i yuridicheskoj praktiki. 2020. № 3. S. 206–208.
3.Voskanyan R.O. Dolgovy`e instrumenty` finansirovaniya strategii ustojchivogo razvitiya kompanii // Problemy` e`konomiki i yuridicheskoj praktiki. 2019. T. 15. № 2. S. 80–83.
4.Naumov A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost` yuridi-cheskix licz // Lex Russica. 2015. T. 104. № 7. S. 57–63.
5.Panteleev I.A. Riski sindicirovannogo kreditovaniya // Finansy`: teoriya i praktika. 2009. № 1. S. 64–67.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Analysis of the level of victimisation of citizens of the Russian Federation in relation to real estate transactions
TARBA Ekaterina Romanovna
Assistant Director of JSC «TZB-Soyuz», Student of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
125167, Moscow, Leningradsky Ave., 49/2, Russian Federation
Abstract: The relevance of the analysis of the level of victimization in relation to real estate transactions is due to the practical orientation, since crimes are often committed within the framework of civil real estate turnover, as a result of which particularly large damage is inflicted on the injured party, and in some cases the person is deprived of the only housing. Despite the thoughtfulness of the crime, often the victim herself contributes to the successful implementation of the criminal intent. As part of the study, judicial practice was reviewed and a sociological survey was conducted demonstrating the current level of legal awareness of the population in this area. Recommendations on ways to prevent this type of crime are given.
Keywords: fraud, real estate, crime, legal awareness, damage
References
1.Ugolovny`j kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 14.04.2023) // Sobranie zakonodatel`stva Rossijskoj Federacii. 1996. 17 iyunya.
2.Prigovor № 1-118/2020 ot 22 iyulya 2020 g. po delu № 1-118/2020 Oktyabr`skogo rajonnogo suda g. Murmanska [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/fk2hLN26ojUC/?page=8&regular-court=&regular-date_from=&regular-case_doc=&regular-lawchunkinfo=Stat`ya+159.+Moshennichestvo%28UK+RF%29&regular-workflow_stage=10&regular-date_to=&regular-area=&regular-txt=moshennichestvo+nedvizhimost`&_=1682983905779&regular-judge=&snippet_pos=17360#snippet.
3.Portal pravovoj statistiki General`noj prokuratury` RF [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://crimestat.ru/analytics.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Smolensk oblast – the «judicial revolution»
GUSEINOVA-VADISH Sevil Gasanovna
Lawyer, Representation of the Smolensk Region Administration to the Government of the Russian Federation
123610, Moscow, Krasnopresnenskaya Embankment, 12, Russian Federation
Abstract: This article examines the topical issue related to the judicial revolution on the example of the Smolensk region. This article analyses the current state and recent transformations of some institutions of the judicial system particularly those affecting the procedure of functioning of courts of general jurisdiction at the level of cassation and appeal proceedings taking into account amendments in the current legislation. In conclusion, the author concludes that further changes in the judicial system should focus on a number of issues: the introduction of a new measure of disciplinary responsibility of judges; definition of criteria for distinguishing judicial error and disciplinary misconduct of judges; introduction of automated systems for distribution of cases among judges; technological modernization of justice; introduction into criminal law the concept of criminal misconduct; accompanying judicial reform with appropriate measures to modernize «related» structures.
Keywords: judicial system, cassation proceedings, appeal proceedings, judicial reform
References
1.Konstituciya Rossijskoj Federacii (prinyata vsenarodny`m golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesenny`x Zakonami RF o popravkax k Konstitucii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 1-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel`stva RF. 2014. № 31. St. 4398.
2.Federal`ny`j konstitucionny`j zakon ot 29.07.2018 № 1-FKZ «O vnesenii izmenenij v Federal`ny`j konstitucionny`j zakon «O sudebnoj sisteme Rossijskoj Federacii» i otdel`ny`e federal`ny`e konstitucionny`e zakony` v svyazi s sozdaniem kassacionny`x sudov obshhej yurisdikcii i apellyacionny`x sudov obshhej yurisdikcii» // Sobranie zakonodatel`stva RF. 2018. № 31. St. 4811.
3.Zakon Smolenskoj oblasti ot 28 marta 2019 goda № 16-z «O vnesenii izmeneniya v stat`yu 9 oblastnogo zakona «O mirovy`x sud`yax Smolenskoj oblasti» // Oficial`ny`j sajt «Konsorcium Kodeks» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/553215306.
4.Postanovlenie Plenuma Verxovnogo Suda RF ot 13.07.2017 № 28 «O vnesenii v Gosudarstvennuyu Dumu Federal`nogo Sobraniya Rossijskoj Federacii proekta federal`nogo konstitucionnogo zakona «O vnesenii izmenenij v federal`ny`e konstitucionny`e zakony` v svyazi s sozdaniem kassacionny`x sudov obshhej yurisdikcii i apellyacionny`x sudov obshhej yurisdikcii». Dokument opublikovan ne by`l. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyusProf» 2019.
5.Avtoritet sudebnoj sistemy` kak osnova dlya reformy` deyatel`nosti mirovy`x sudej [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://smoldaily.ru/avtoritet-sudebnoj-sistemy-kak-osnova-dlya-reformy-deyatelnosti-mirovyh-sudej.
6.Prezident vy`stupil na torzhestvennom sobranii, posvyashhyonnom 95-letiyu Verxovnogo Suda [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/56688.
7.Sarkisov M.S. Sudebnaya reforma 2018 goda. Vse «za» i «protiv» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46506904.
8.Sudebnaya reforma v Rossii. Plyusy` i minusy` sozdaniya apellyacionny`x i kassacionny`x sudov [E`lektron-ny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.eg-online.ru/article/353062.
9.Fakeeva L.E. Sudebnaya reforma v Rossii: ponyatie i mexanizm realizacii [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36905028.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Commissions on juvenile affairs and protection of the minors rights: purpose and reality
BYLINSKAYA Natalia Aleksandrovna
Senior investigator of the organizational and zonal department Investigation Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Oryol Region
302028, Oryol, Turgeneva st., 15, Russian Federation
Abstract: The article provides a retrospective analysis of the activities of commissions on juvenile affairs and protection of the minors rights, examines the problems of the implementation of the powers granted to them and their effectiveness in modern Russia.
Keywords: minors, children, commission on juvenile affairs and protection of the minors rights, prevention of neglect and juvenile delinquency
References
1.Krasheninnikov P.V. Zashhitim sem`yu – zashhitim detej // Rossijskaya gazeta. 2020. 31 maya.
2.Dekret SNK RSFSR ot 14 yanvarya 1918 g. (utratil silu) «O komissiyax dlya nesovershennoletnix».
3.Postanovlenie SNK SSSR, CzK VKP(b) ot 31 maya 1935 g. (utratil silu) «O likvidacii detskoj besprizornosti i beznadzornosti».
4.Postanovlenie CIK SSSR № 3, SNK SSSR № 598 ot 7 aprelya 1935 g. (utratilo silu) «O merax bor`by` s prestupnost`yu sredi nesovershennoletnix».
5.Pis`mo Narodnogo Komissara Vnutrennix Del SSSR L.P. Berii i Prokurora SSSR M. Pankrat`eva v CzK VKP(b) na imya I.V. Stalina i v SNK SSSR na imya V.M. Molotova. 28 fevralya 1940 g. // GARF. F. 8131. Op. 37. D. 137. Ll. 4–11.
6.Iz doklada zamestitelya nachal`nika GULAGa A.P. Lepilova na imya L.P. Berii, S.N. Kruglova, V.V. Cherny`shova i B.Z. Kobulova. 1 marta 1940 g. // GARF. F. 9414. Op. 1. D. 28. Ll. 37–40.
7.Uporov I.V. Profilaktika prestupnosti sredi nesovershennoletnix osuzhdenny`x v predvoenny`j period: analiz dokumentov NKVD SSSR // Naukosfera. 2021. № 4–2. S. 352–357.
8.Postanovlenie Sovmina RSFSR ot 4 oktyabrya 1957 g. № 1099 (utratilo silu) «O merax uluchsheniya raboty` sredi detej vne shkoly` i preduprezhdeniya detskoj beznadzornosti».
9.Ukaz Prezidiuma Verxovnogo Soveta RSFSR ot 29 avgusta 1961 g. (utratil silu) «Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya o komissiyax po delam nesovershennoletnix».
10.Ukaz Prezidiuma Verxovnogo Soveta RSFSR ot 3 iyunya 1967 g. (utratil silu) «Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya o komissiyax po delam nesovershennoletnix».
11.Ukaz Prezidenta Rossii ot 6 sentyabrya 1993 g. № 1338 (utratil silu) «O profilaktike beznadzornosti i pravonarushenij nesovershennoletnix, zashhite ix prav».
12.Postanovlenie Pravitel`stva Rossijskoj Federacii ot 6 maya 2006 g. № 272 (red. ot 18.08.2018) «O Pravitel`stvennoj komissii po delam nesovershennoletnix i zashhite ix prav» (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 18.08.2018).
13.Postanovlenie Pravitel`stva Omskoj oblasti ot 6 aprelya 2015 g. № 83-p (red. ot 18.05.2023) «O komissii po delam nesovershennoletnix i zashhite ix prav pri Pravitel`stve Omskoj oblasti» (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 26.05.2023).
14.Zakon Orlovskoj oblasti ot 30 iyunya 2006 g. № 602-OZ (red. ot 01.02.2023) «O nadelenii organov mestnogo samoupravleniya municipal`ny`x obrazovanij Orlovskoj oblasti otdel`ny`mi gosudarstvenny`mi polnomochiyami Orlovskoj oblasti po sozdaniyu komissij po delam nesovershennoletnix i zashhite ix prav i organizacii deyatel`nosti e`tix komissij» (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 12.02.2023).
15.Zakon Smolenskoj oblasti ot 31 marta 2008 g. № 24-z (red. ot 29.09.2022) «O nadelenii organov mestnogo samoupravleniya municipal`ny`x rajonov i gorodskix okrugov Smolenskoj oblasti gosudarstvenny`mi polnomochiyami po sozdaniyu i organizacii deyatel`nosti komissij po delam nesovershennoletnix i zashhite ix prav» (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 10.10.2022).
16.Arzhanov V.V. Vy`zovy`, stoyashhie pered Komissiyami po delam nesovershennoletnix i zashhite ix prav // Vestnik Saratovskoj gosudarstvennoj yuridicheskoj akademii. 2022. № 5(148). S. 114–124.
17.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 24 iyunya 1999 g. № 120-FZ (red. ot 21.11.2022) «Ob osnovax sistemy` profilaktiki beznadzornosti i pravonarushenij nesovershennoletnix» (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 02.12.2022).
18.Postanovlenie Pravitel`stva Rossijskoj Federacii ot 6 noyabrya 2013 g. № 995 (red. ot 10.02.2020) «Ob utverzhdenii Primernogo polozheniya o komissiyax po delam nesovershennoletnix i zashhite ix prav» (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 20.02.2020).
19.Bezhencev A.A. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie sistemy` profilaktiki pravonarushenij nesovershennoletnix: monografiya. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta MVD Rossii, 2022.
20.Taibova O.Yu. Pravovoj status komissii po delam nesovershennoletnix i zashhite ix prav: problemy` i perspektivy` razvitiya // Lex Russica (Russkij zakon). 2015. T. 98. № 1. S. 59–66.
21.https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/HfxUmMeDq1gC/.
22.https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/HnCaddtHRs6Z/.
23.https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/pRpizyaE1zNt/.
24.https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/bUePn8wsF8ol/.
25.https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/ghzBPfiwlbWx/.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Features of fraudulent actions on real estate transactions concluded in simple written form
SHAIDULLINA Venera Kamilevna
Ph.D., Associate Professor of the Faculty of Law of the State Academic University of Humanities
119049, Moscow, Maronovsky lane, 26, Russian Federation
Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of the features of fraudulent actions on real estate transactions concluded in simple written form. The author considers three groups of fraudulent schemes in the field of real estate (open theft of someone else's property; fraudulent actions disguised as legal procedures for the purpose of misleading; acts to challenge the transaction in the future). The analysis of judicial practice was also carried out in order to identify the most common fraudulent schemes in the real estate sector. At the end of the study, it was concluded that the existing fraudulent schemes are possible due to insufficient legal literacy and inattention of citizens. To prevent such actions, citizens should exercise legal prudence. As the most effective way to protect citizens from fraud in real estate transactions, the author suggests mandatory notarization of such transactions.
Keywords: fraud, fraudulent actions, fraudulent schemes, real estate, property, simple written form, transactions, judicial practice.
References
1.Aleshin V.V. Prestupleniya, svyazanny`e s otchuzhdeniem zhil`ya grazhdan. M.: E`kzamen, 2016.
2.Evseenkov S.A. Moshennichestvo v sfere oborota nedvizhimosti v sovremennom rossijskom obshhestve // Yuridicheskaya my`sl`. 2022. № 4(128). S. 101–116.
3.Zaleskina A.N. Nekotory`e osobennosti kriminalisticheskoj xarakteristiki moshennichestva (na primere ch. 4 st. 159 UK RF) // Aktual`ny`e problemy` predvaritel`nogo rassledovaniya: sbornik nauchny`x statej mezhdunarodny`x nauchno-prakticheskix konferencij, Sankt-Peterburg, 20 aprelya 2021 goda – 25 aprelya 2022 goda. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskij universitet MVD Rossii, 2022. S. 80–84.
4.Korkina N.M., Babin A.A. Moshennichestvo na ry`nke nedvizhimosti: sposoby` zashhity` i vosstanovleniya prav postradavshix // Imushhestvenny`e otnosheniya v RF. 2014. № 4 (151). S. 52.
5.Kozlova S. Raskry`ty` novy`e moshennicheskie sxemy` na ry`nke nedvizhimosti // Dajdzhest rossijskoj i zarubezhnoj nedvizhimosti. 2017. № (43). S. 77–81.
6.Melexin S.A. Kriminologicheskaya xarakteristika prestuplenij protiv sobstvennosti // Yuridicheskij fakt. 2019. № 60. S. 3–6.
7.Marchenko E.R., Samarkina L.A. Moshennichestvo na ry`nke nedvizhimosti sovremennoj Rossii // Razvitie finansovogo ry`nka i predprinimatel`skix struktur v sovremenny`x usloviyax: materialy` Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, provodimoj v ramkax Vsemirnoj nedeli predprinimatel`stva, Volgograd, 10–12 noyabrya 2021 goda. Volgograd: Sfera, 2022. S. 96–99.
8.Storublenkova E.G., Erin E.N. Statisticheskaya xarakteristika prestuplenij protiv sobstvennosti // Probely` v rossijskom zakonodatel`stve. 2018. № 7. S. 116–121.
9.Suxorukova T.S. Moshennichestvo v sfere nedvizhimosti: aktual`ny`e problemy` pravoprimenitel`noj praktiki. M.: Poligraf-Master, 2012. S. 194.
10.Churilov Yu.Yu. Moshennichestvo v sfere nedvizhimosti. M.: Feniks, 2023.
11.Shirina N.V., Malyuk D.B. Opasnost` zaklyucheniya dogovorov kupli-prodazhi, sovershenny`x v prostoj pis`mennoj forme // Vektor GeoNauk. 2022. T. 5. № 3. S. 68–71.
12.Prigovor Pervomajskogo rajonnogo suda g. Penzy` ot 18 iyulya 2016 g. po delu № 1-20/2016 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://rospravjmnxyxlu3.onion/court-pervomajskij-rajonnyj-sud-g-omska-omskaya-oblast-s/act-549997055/.
13.Prigovor Vladimirskogo oblastnogo suda ot 16 maya 2016 goda po delu № 2-1/2016 (2-23/2015) [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://rospravjmnxyxlu3.onion/court-vladimirskij-oblastnoj-sud-vladimirskaya-oblast-s/act-502723999.
14.Prigovor Oktyabr`skogo rajonnogo suda № 1-278/2015 ot 16 sentyabrya 2015 g. po delu № 1-278/2015 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/6KxS0pIHQX1B/?page=8.
15.Prigovor Borovskogo rajonnogo suda Kaluzhskoj oblasti № 1-164/2016 ot 30 sentyabrya 2016 g. po delu № 1-164/2016 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/XrJwIgB0bcl8.
16.Prigovor Industrial`nogo rajonnogo suda g. Barnaula ot 23 avgusta 2017 goda po delu № 1-423/17 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/cFRMFFr0pXNJ.
17.Prigovor Pravoberezhnogo rajonnogo suda g. Magnitogorska (Chelyabinskaya oblast`) № 1-3/2016 1-460/2014 1-59/2015 ot 24 fevralya 2016 g. po delu № 1-3/2016 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/UxqA6xrwVBrC/.
18.Prigovor Noginskogo gorodskogo suda Moskovskoj oblasti po delu (nomer obezlichen) ot 28 iyulya 2010 goda [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.gcourts.ru/case/ 7196444.
19.Prigovor Sovetskogo rajonnogo suda g. Bryanska ot 27 aprelya 2016 g. po delu 1-25/2016 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://rospravjmnxyxlu3.onion/court-sovetskij-rajonnyj-sud-g-bryanska-bryanskaya-oblast-s/act-550234661.
20.Prigovor Ximkinskogo gorodskogo suda ot 10.07.2014 po delu № 1-15/2014 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://himki--mo.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=case&case_id=112735665&case_uid=83607249-c219-472e-ab46-2f0ce29b4661&delo_id=1540006.
21.Prigovor № 1-174/2018 1-9/2019 ot 25 fevralya 2019 g. po delu № 1-174/2018 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/2RVas6KYQzd9.
22.Prigovor Cherkesskogo gorodskogo suda Karacha-evo-Cherkesskoj Respubliki ot 22 noyabrya 2016 goda po delu 1-266/2016 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://rospravjmnxyxlu3.onion/court-cherkesskij-gorodskoj-sud-karachaevo-cherkesskaya-respublika-s/act-562246224/.
23.Prigovor Sovetskogo rajonnogo suda goroda Lipeczka ot 18 iyulya 2016 goda po delu 1-1/2016 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://rospravjmnxyxlu3.onion/court-sovetskij-rajonnyj-sud-g-lipecka-lipeckaya-oblast-s/act-537726035/.
24.Prigovor Oktyabr`skogo rajonnogo suda g. Moskvy` ot 18 marta 2015 goda po delu 1-49/2015 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://rospravjmnxyxlu3.onion/court-oktyabrskij-rajonnyj-sud-g-ivanovo-ivanovskaya-oblast-s/act-489124354/.
25.Prigovor Chkalovskogo rajonnogo suda g. Ekaterinburga po delu № 1-36/2017 (1-558/2016) [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.sud-praktika.ru/precedent/253392.html/.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Access of law enforcement authorities to personal data: topical issues
KONYUKHOV Vladislav Vladimirovich
Student of the Law Institute of Peoples Friendship University of Russia
117198, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya str., 6, Russian Federation
Abstract: The article considers the opinions for and against the access of law enforcement agencies to the electronic devices of citizens without a court decision. This topic has been researched recently by scholars to improve the activities of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, but may affect the constitutional rights of citizens.
Keywords: Constitutional rights of citizens, privacy, personal and family secrecy, correspondence secrecy, electronic devices, law enforcement agencies
References
1.Konstituciya Rossijskoj Federacii (prinyata vsenarodny`m golosovaniem 12.12.1993 s izmeneniyami, odobrenny`mi v xode obshherossijskogo golosovaniya 01.07.2020).
2.Federal`ny`j zakon «Ob operativno-rozy`sknoj deyatel`nosti» ot 12.08.1995 № 144-FZ.
3.Osipenko A.L., Lugovik V.F. Problemy` dostupa pravooxranitel`ny`x organov k skry`vaemoj komp`yuternoj informacii pri raskry`tii prestuplenij // Obshhestvo i pravo. 2021. № 2 (76) [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-dostupa-pravoohranitelnyh-organo v-k-skryvaemoy-kompyuternoy-informatsii-pri-raskrytii-prestupleniy.
4.https://senatinform.ru/news/mvd_planiruet_poluchit_dostup_k_elektronnym_ustroystvam_grazhdan_bez_razresheniya_suda/?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=messenger.
5.Malyanova K.P. Aktual`ny`e problemy` deyatel`nosti pravooxranitel`ny`x organov pri vy`yavlenii i raskry`tii prestuplenij s ispol`zovaniem e`lektronny`x sredstv platezha // YuP. 2021. № 2 (97) [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/aktualnye-problemy-v-deyatelnosti-pravoohranitelnyh-organov-pri-vyyavlenii-i-raskrytii-prestupleniy-s-ispolzovaniem-elektronnyh.
6.https://novideo.rbc.ru/politics/16/08/2023/64dcd2009a7947b03aed2e6c.
7.Dadashov M.M. Pravo grazhdan na tajnu perepiski: problemy` ogranicheniya // Obrazovanie. Nauka. Nauchny`e kadry`. 2021. № 4 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravo-grazhdan-na-taynu-perepiski-problemy-ogranicheniya.

ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF LAW SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Legal sovereignty: an attempt to justify
PODOSINNIKOVA Lyudmila Anatolyevna
Ph.D., Associate Professor of the Russian Academy of Advocacy and Notaries, Lawyer of the Bar Association «Dictatorship of the Law» of Moscow
105120, Moscow, Maly Poluyaroslavsky Lane, 3/5, p. 1, Russian Federation
Abstract: The purpose of the work is to identify and evaluate the most important properties of the phenomenon under consideration called «legal sovereignty». The method of system analysis, the historical-philosophical method, the formal-legal method, the philosophical method of idealism were used. The article examines the views of some domestic and foreign authors regarding this phenomenon, which has not yet found its rightful place in legal science. This is especially true of modern political and legal practice, which dictates its own conceptual and semantic discourse. In legal science, the category of «legal sovereignty» should be filled with its own semantic content as a complex political and legal property of the government and the state, expressed in the diversity of public relations between the state and citizens, the state and society, the state and the state in the international arena, the state and the people in connection with the implementation of state power. The general properties of this phenomenon are revealed. The significance of the work lies in the fact that it formulates theoretical provisions aimed at forming full-fledged ideas about legal sovereignty and the development of this property by states in modern conditions.
Keywords: Civilization, state, legal sovereignty, law, power, freedom
References
1.Gegel` G.V.F. Filosofiya prava. M., 1990. S. 318.
2.Il`in I.A. Obshhee uchenie o prave i gosudarstve // Teoriya prava i gosudarstva: uchebnik / pod red. i s predisl. V.A. Tomsinova. M., 2003. S. 154.
3.Pravovaya politika: problemy` formirovaniya: sbornik nauchny`x statej po itogam raboty` «kruglogo stola» / pod red. A.V. Mal`ko. Tambov, 2010.
4.Kant I. Metafizika nravov: v 2 ch. // Kant I. Soch.: v 6 t. M., 1965. T. 4. Ch. 2. S. 78–234.
5.Uemov A.I. Veshhi, svojstva i otnosheniya. M.: Kniga po Trebovaniyu, 2013.
6.Rozhdestvenskij A. Teoriya sub``ektivny`x politi-cheskix prav. M., 1913. S. 263–266.
7.Tunkin G.I. Pravo i sila v mezhdunarodnoj sisteme. M., 1983. S. 5–11.
8.Xabermas Yu. Vovlechenie drugogo: Ocherki politicheskoj teorii: per. s nem. SPb., 2001. S. 225–229.
9.Bespalova M.V. Pravovoe zakreplenie gosudarstvennogo suvereniteta v sovremenny`x evropejskix stranax: dis. … kand. nauk. M., 2014. S. 85.
10.Efremov A.A. Informacionno-pravovoj mexanizm obespecheniya gosudarstvennogo suvereniteta Rossijskoj Federacii: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2021.
11.Al`bov A.P. Pravovaya sistema Rossii kak osnovanie suverennogo rezhima zakonnosti // Legal Bulletin. 2023. № 1. T. 8. S. 11.
12.Galushko D.V. Razvitie koncepcii suvereniteta gosudarstv v usloviyax chlenstva v mezhdunarodny`x organizaciyax // Severokavkazskij yuridicheskij vestnik. 2020. № 1. S. 40.
13.Kerimov D.A. V razvitie diskussii o filosofii i prave. Recenziya na monografiyu S.I. Zaxarceva i V.P. Sal`nikova «Filosofiya. Filosofiya prava. Yuridicheskaya nauka». M., 2015 // Pravovoe pole sovremennoj e`konomiki. 2015. № 1. S. 78–85.
14.Kolesnikov A.S., Maslennikov D.V., Guk A.I. Razmy`shleniya o filosofsko-pravovy`x rabotax S.I. Zaxarceva i svoeobrazii ego filosofii // Yuridicheskaya nauka: istoriya i sovremennost`. 2015. № 12. S. 177–184.
15.Laski G.Dzh. O suverenitete gosudarstva // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i politicheskie nauki. 2020. № 4. C. 152–161.
16.Pokrovskij I.F., Guk A.I. Kogda filosofiya i pravo snova vmeste. Recenziya na monografiyu S.I. Zaxarceva «Nekotory`e problemy` teorii i filosofii prava» / pod red. V.P. Sal`nikova. M., 2014 // Mir politiki i sociologii. 2015. № 2. S. 184–190.
17.Pokrovskij I.F., Ismagilov R.F., Guk A.I. Dejstvitel`-no, filosofiya i pravo snova vmeste v issledovanii sovremenny`x nauchny`x my`slitelej. Nekotory`e idei po povodu recenzii D.A. Kerimova i monografii S.I. Zaxarceva i V.P. Sal`nikova «Filosofiya. Filosofiya prava. Yuridicheskaya nauka». M., 2015.
18.Tixomirov Yu.A. Pravovoj suverenitet: sfery` i garantii // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2013. № 3. S. 5.
19.Chirkin V.E. Integracionny`e mezhgosudarstvenny`e processy`, konstitucii i gosudarstvenny`j suverenitet // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel`stva i sravnitel`nogo pravovedeniya. 2019. № 3. S. 5–19.
20.Sharifov M.Sh. Teoreticheskie problemy` opredeleniya soderzhaniya i sootnosheniya narodnogo, gosudarstvennogo i nacional`nogo suvereniteta // Trudy` instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2009. № 2. S. 3–16.
21.Sharifov M.Sh. Konstitucionno-pravovaya institucionalizaciya suvereniteta i ego transformaciya pod vliyaniem informatizacii. M., 2009. S. 7.
22.Gadzhiev K.S. Politicheskaya nauka: ucheb. posob. dlya vuzov. M., 1995. S. 104.
23.Luk`yanova E.G. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Vvedenie v estestvenno-pravovoj kurs. M., 2011. S. 161.
24.Uchebnik gosudarstvennogo prava / Soch. prof. Kazanskogo universiteta V.V. Ivanovskogo. Kazan`, 1908. S. 75.
25.Konstitucionny`j suverenitet Rossijskoj Federacii obespechit soblyudenie prav i svobod grazhdan na fone krizisa mezhdunarodnogo prava [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://legalforum.info/news/konstitutsionnyj-suverenitet-rossijskoj-federatsii-obespechit-sobljudenie-prav-i-svobod-grazhdan-na-fone-krizisa-mezhdunarodnogo-prava.
26.Krabbe H. Die Lehre von der Rechtssouveränität. Beitrag zur Staatslehre. Groningen, 1906. S. 9.
27.Aristotel`. Metafizika. Gl. 4 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/Metafizika(Aristotel`; Kubiczkij)/Kniga tret`ya.

ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF LAW SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Problematic issues of the subject composition of neighborhood legal relations
EGUBOVA Tatyana Vladimirovna
Magistrature Student of the Faculty of Law of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
105187, Moscow,Shcherbakovskaya str., 8, Russian Federation
Abstract: Neighborhood relations remain fragmentally regulated in the domestic legal system. The purpose of the article is to offer solutions to problematic issues of the subject composition of neighborhood legal relations. The author comes to the conclusion that in order to protect the rights and legitimate interests of neighbors, it is advisable to consider as subjects of neighborhood legal relations all citizens and legal entities who have a contact of interests in the process of using premises, land owned, leased, rented, etc., provided they are in close proximity and (or) the presence of common property. The significance of the article is due to the developed proposals for improving the housing legislation of the Russian Federation.
Keywords: neighborhood legal relations; neighbors; owner; apartment building; protection of rights; good faith
References
1.Zhivov A.A. O sosedskom prave i predial`ny`x servitutax // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2012. № 2. S. 21–24.
2.Suyundukova A.Yu. Ponyatie sosedskogo prava // Pravovoe gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2015. № 2 (40). S. 122–126.
3.Paciya T.M. Kriterii otneseniya pomeshheniya k kategorii zhily`x i problema apartamentov // Semejnoe i zhilishhnoe pravo. 2019. № 4. S. 44–48.
4.Semenova E.G. O predmete pravovogo regulirovaniya sosedskogo prava // Civilist. 2022. № 4. S. 40–46.

POLICY AND ECONOMY OF EURASIA
Russia's Bank's protection of the financial system during the sanctions period
KRASNENKOVA Elena Valeryevna
Ph.D., Associate Professor of the Department of International and Public Law of Faculty of Law of the Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation
125167, Moscow, Leningradsky Ave., 49/2, Russian Federation
Abstract: The article is devoted to the study of anti-crisis measures against sanctions of foreign unfriendly states. The State takes protective anti-crisis measures, control mechanisms, and counteraction measures in order not only to stabilize, but also to further develop the Russian Federation. The counter-sanctions measures aimed at ensuring the stability of the Russian financial system are analyzed. At the legislative level, there is a change in the norms of law due to the influence of sanctions of unfriendly states. The Bank of Russia takes preventive measures to ensure the security of the financial system not only in the legal field, but also in the technological field.
Keywords: financial system, sanctions, misseling, arbitration court, foreign states, anti-crisis measures, Bank of Russia
References
1.Kazhdaya shestaya zhaloba v Bank Rossii za pervuyu polovinu 2022 goda by`la svyazana s sankciyami // Bank Rossii [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://cbr.ru/press/event/?id=14053#highlight=sankciyami.
2.Fedorova I.A., Yagovkina A.I. Kiberprestupnost` v sfere finansovy`x texnologij // Bezopasnost` biznesa. 2023. № 1. S. 44–50.
3.Osnovny`e napravleniya razvitiya finansovogo ry`nka Rossijskoj Federacii na 2023 god i period 2024 i 2025 godov // Vestnik Banka Rossii. 2022. № 63. S. 68.
4.Cepova E.A. Finansovy`e aktivy` i e`lektronny`e sredstva platezha za predelami Rossijskoj Federacii: osobennosti valyutnogo regulirovaniya // Nalogi. 2022. № 5. S. 24–27.

POLICY AND ECONOMY OF EURASIA
Problems of law application and functioning of institutions for state joint-stock companies governance
YAKOVLEV Alexander Yurievich
LL.D., Leading researcher of Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Science
117218, Moscow, Nakhimovsky prospect, 32, Russian Federation
Abstract: Russian institutions and law are not ideal. A considerable number of problems exist in the civil law and public law spheres. In particular, they exist in governance of joint-stock companies with federal and regional participation. In this scientific work the problem areas such as institutions and the legal framework for governing companies with the participation of a state as shareholder will be considered. Among them: a differentiated approach of a shareholder to determining the procedure for governing companies; the ambiguity of the institution of directives; low level of transparency in the selection of professional directors and independent experts; high degree of bureaucratization, etc.
Keywords: application of law, law enforcement, functioning of institutions, joint-stock company with state participation, state joint-stock company
References
1.Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (chast` pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru.
2.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 26.12.1995 № 208-FZ «Ob akcionerny`x obshhestvax» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru.
3.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 27.02.2003 № 29-FZ «Ob osobennostyax upravleniya i rasporyazheniya imushhestvom zheleznodorozhnogo transporta» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru.
4.Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 04.08.2004 № 1009 «Ob utverzhdenii Perechnya strategicheskix predpriyatij i strategicheskix akcionerny`x obshhestv» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru.
5.Postanovlenie Pravitel`stva RF ot 03.12.2004 № 738 «Ob upravlenii naxodyashhimisya v federal`noj sobstvennosti akciyami akcionerny`x obshhestv i ispol`zovanii special`nogo prava na uchastie Rossijskoj Federacii v upravlenii akcionerny`mi obshhestvami («zolotoj akcii»)» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru.
6.Rasporyazhenie Pravitel`stva RF ot 23.01.2003 № 91-r «Ob utverzhdenii perechnej OAO, v otnoshenii kotory`x opredelenie pozicii akcionera – RF po otdel`ny`m voprosam osushhestvlyaetsya Pravitel`stvom RF...» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru.
7.Postanovlenie Pravitel`stva Moskvy` ot 03.07.2007 № 576-PP «O poryadke vzaimodejstviya organov ispolnitel`noj vlasti goroda Moskvy` pri realizacii prav akcionera…» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru.
8.Pis`mo Banka Rossii ot 10.04.2014 № 06-52/2463 «O Kodekse korporativnogo upravleniya» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru.
9.Glazunova I.V. Problemny`e voprosy` publichno-pravovoj otvetstvennosti yuridicheskogo licza // Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie. 2019. № 4. S. 512–517.
10.Korporativny`j uroven` sistemy` GiMU v Rossii // Gosudarstvennoe i municipal`noe upravlenie: informacionno-obrazovatel`ny`j portal [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://gimyrf.ru/corporativnyj_uroven.
11.Lepeshkina V.S. Pravovoe regulirovanie procedury` mediacii v e`konomicheskoj deyatel`nosti: poryadok i usloviya realizacii // Evrazijskaya advokatura. 2023. № 3. S. 66–69.
12.Pavlov A.Yu., Danilov I.A. O kriteriyax subsidiarnoj otvetstvennosti // Yuridicheskij mir. 2022. № 3. S. 48–49.
13.Petuxov S.V., Racheeva Yu.V. Subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost` kontroliruyushhix licz v kontekste principa pravovoj opredelennosti // Evrazijskaya advokatura. 2023. № 3. S. 62–65.
14.Smotriczkaya I.I. Strategicheskie podxody` k povy`sheniyu e`ffektivnosti institutov gosudarstvennogo upravleniya // E`TAP: e`konomicheskaya teoriya, analiz, praktika. 2018. № 1. S. 45–60.
15.Smotriczkaya I.I., Anchishkina O.V., Cherny`x S.I. Problemy` i strategicheskie zadachi razvitiya instituta obshhestvenny`x zakupok // Problemy` prognozirovaniya. 2017. № 5. S. 70–78.

POLICY AND ECONOMY OF EURASIA
Ensuring the social obligations of the state as an element of its constitutional foundations
ROZENKO Svetlana Vladimirovna
Postgraduate Student of the Department of Jurisprudence of the Institute of Economics, Management and Law of Irkutsk National Research Technical University (IRNTU)
664074, Irkutsk, Lermontov str., 83, Russian Federation
Abstract: Social policy and social obligations of the state play an important role in ensuring the stability and well-being of society. They contribute to the creation of conditions for the development of each individual, as well as the formation of a fair and socially responsible society. The social obligations of the state are not just charity. They play the role of regulators of socio-economic and socio-political processes in society. They contribute to the creation of a more just and equal society, where every citizen has the opportunity to receive the necessary support and protection from the state.
Keywords: social obligations, state, socio-economic basis, constitutional system, society, personality, benefits, welfare state
References
1.Arutyunyan D.G. Organizacionno-pravovaya forma social`nogo obespecheniya kak obyazatel`ny`j atribut social`nogo gosudarstva // Aktual`ny`e nauchny`e issledovaniya v sovremennom mire. 2020. № 11–7 (67). S. 48–53.
2.By`strenko V.I., Yaroslavcev V.G. Rossijskaya model` social`nogo gosudarstva: osnovny`e cherty` i perspektivy` social`no-e`konomicheskogo razvitiya // CITISE`. 2019. № 5 (22). S. 110–117.
3.Kozlov S.D. Rossiya kak social`noe gosudarstvo: obo-snovannaya konstitucionnaya zadacha i razreshitel`naya politicheskaya praktika // Chronos. 2019. № 7 (34). S. 3–7.
4.Ledovich T.S., Kakotkin N.S., Kryuchkova I.V. Konstitucionny`e osnovy` social`no-e`konomicheskoj politiki rossijskogo gosudarstva: social`noe gosudarstvo, problemy` i puti realizacii // Teoriya e`konomiki i upravleniya narodny`m xozyajstvom: Vestnik Instituta druzhby` narodov Kavkaza. E`konomicheskie nauki. 2021. № 2 (58).
5.Sedova N.P., Dorogov D.S. Razvitie zakonodatel`stva v social`nom gosudarstve: proisxozhdenie faktorov, privodyashhix k izmeneniyu v social`noj politike // Ucheny`e zapiski. 2022. № 2 (42). S. 203–207.
6.Sizemskaya I.N. Social`noe gosudarstvo kak konstitucionny`j princip Rossijskoj Federacii: social`ny`e vektory` razvitiya // Vestnik Instituta sociologii. 2020. T. 11. № 3. S. 179–186.
7.Fedotova N.N. Social`noe gosudarstvo – rezul`tat e`volyucii nacional`nogo gosudarstva // Voprosy` filosofii. 2019. № 10. S. 17–21.
8.Feoktistov A.V. Social`noe gosudarstvo kak gosudarstvo novogo tipa // Nauka. Obshhestvo. Gosudarstvo. 2021. T. 9. № 2 (34). S. 68–78.

POLICY AND ECONOMY OF EURASIA
Analysis of changes in the legal regulation of financial transactions in the context of civil law reform
KARPOV Alexander Vyacheslavovich
Postgraduate Student of Moscow Financial and Industrial University «Synergy»
129090, Moscow, Meshchanskaya str., 9/14, p. 1, Russian Federation
Abstract: This scientific article is devoted to the study of changes in the legal regulation of financial transactions adopted in Russia in recent years. The article describes the new rules, their impact on the market of financial instruments and provides recommendations for their application. The main conclusions of the article indicate the need for continuous improvement of legal regulation to ensure stability in the financial market.
Keywords: financial transactions, civil law, regulation, legislation, stability
References
1.Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (chasti pervaya, vtoraya i tret`ya) ot 26.01.1996 № 14-FZ.
2.Degtyarev A.N. Analiz izmenenij v pravovom regulirovanii finansovy`x sdelok // Yuridicheskij mir. 2018. № 5. S. 43–48.
3.Kuzneczov V.M. Finansovy`e instrumenty` i ry`nki: uchebnik. M.: YuNITI-DANA, 2019.
4.Malaxova E.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie finansovy`x instrumentov v Rossijskoj Federacii // Vestnik PGUPS. 2019. № 4. S. 103–107.
5.Podoprigora Yu.M. Regulirovanie finansovy`x instrumentov na rossijskom ry`nke // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2017. № 10. S. 57–68.
6.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 27.07.2010 № 244-FZ «O ry`nke cenny`x bumag».
7.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 21.11.2011 № 325-FZ «O marketingovy`x issledovaniyax».
8.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 07.08.2001 № 115-FZ «O protivodejstvii legalizacii (otmy`vaniyu) doxodov, poluchenny`x prestupny`m putem, i finansirovaniyu terrorizma».
9.Shevchenko N.A. Novacii v zakonodatel`stve o ry`nke cenny`x bumag // Arbitrazhny`j i grazhdanskij process. 2017. № 5. S. 33–39.

POLICY AND ECONOMY OF EURASIA
Legal support for small and medium-sized businesses in Moscow
BIRICH Alexey Andreevich
Postgraduate Student of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia), Head of the Department of Legal Support and Handling Appeals of the State budgetary institution «Small Business of Moscow»
117638, Moscow, Azovskaya str., 2, building 1, Russian Federation
Abstract: The article discusses the organizational and legal foundations of legal support for small and medium-sized businesses in the city of Moscow. Information is provided on the main regulatory legal acts, as well as on the activities of specialized state institutions in the field of legal support for SMEs.
Keywords: legal support, regulatory legal regulation, small and medium-sized businesses, business protection, national projects
References
1.Alekseeva E.V. Mesto predprinimatel`stva v sovremennom obshhestve // Territoriya novy`x vozmozhnostej. 2010. № 4 (8).
2.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 24.07.2007 № 209-FZ «O razvitii malogo i srednego predprinimatel`stva v Rossijskoj Federacii».
3.Ukaz Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federacii ot 21.07.2020 № 474 «O nacional`ny`x celyax razvitiya Rossijskoj Federacii na period do 2030 goda» // Sobranie zakonodatel`stva Rossijskoj Federacii. 2020. 27 iyulya. № 30. St. 4884.
4.Zakon g. Moskvy` ot 26.11.2008 № 60 «O podderzhke i razvitii malogo i srednego predprinimatel`stva v gorode Moskve» // Vestnik Me`ra i Pravitel`stva Moskvy`. 2008. № 70. 16 dekabrya.
5.Postanovlenie Pravitel`stva Moskvy` ot 26.09.2019 № 1177-PP «Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya o Departamente predprinimatel`stva i innovacionnogo razvitiya goroda Moskvy`» // Vestnik Me`ra i Pravitel`stva Moskvy`. 2012. № 13. 6 marta.
6.Postanovlenie Pravitel`stva Moskvy` ot 22.02.2012 № 66-PP «O Shtabe po zashhite prav i zakonny`x interesov sub``ektov investicionnoj i predprinimatel`skoj deyatel`nosti v gorode Moskve, a takzhe iny`x rabochix organax Pravitel`stva Moskvy` v sfere investicionnoj i predprinimatel`skoj deyatel`nosti» // Vestnik Me`ra i Pravitel`stva Moskvy`. 2012. № 13. 6 marta.
7.Pasport Nacional`nogo proekta «Maloe i srednee predprinimatel`stvo i podderzhka individual`noj predprinimatel`skoj iniciativy`».
8.Doklad Upolnomochennogo pri Prezidente Rossijskoj Federacii po zashhite prav predprinimatelej «Reestr sistemny`x problem rossijskogo biznesa – 2022» // Oficial`ny`j sajt Upolnomochennogo pri Prezidente Rossijskoj Federacii po zashhite prav predprinimatelej [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://doklad.ombudsmanbiz.ru/doklad_2022.html.
9.Opros Ministerstva e`konomicheskogo razvitiya RF i AO «Korporaciya «MSP» ob e`ffektivnosti cifrovy`x servisov dlya predprinimatelej, 11 fevralya – 12 marta 2021 goda [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://economy.gov.ru/material/news/predprinimateli_nazvali_prioritetnye_servisy_dlya_cifrovoy_ekosistemy_msp.html.
10.Oficial`ny`j sajt Federal`noj nalogovoj sluzhby` [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://ofd.nalog.ru/statistics.html?statDate=&level=0&fo=1&ssrf=77.
11.Oficial`ny`j sajt Shtaba po zashhite biznesa [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://shtab.mos.ru/tpost/v7t4h6zc91-dlya-samogo-otvetstvennogo-biznesa.
12.Rasporyazhenie Pravitel`stva Moskvy` № 105-RP ot 07.03.2012 «O sozdanii Gosudarstvennogo byudzhetnogo uchrezhdeniya goroda Moskvy` «Maly`j biznes Moskvy`» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.mos.ru/authority/documents/doc/9112220/.
13.Oficial`ny`j sajt GBU «Maly`j biznes Moskvy`» [E`lek-tronny`j resurs]. URL: https://mbm.mos.ru/education/obuchayushchiye-meropriyatiya?page=1&themes=[1272903].
14.Oficial`ny`j sajt GBU «Maly`j biznes Moskvy`» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://mbm.mos.ru/article/proverki/prava-predprinimatelej?page=1.
15.Oficial`ny`j sajt GBU «Maly`j biznes Moskvy`» [E`lek-tronny`j resurs]. URL: https://mbm.mos.ru/zkbd?page=1.
16.Oficial`ny`j sajt Shtaba po zashhite biznesa [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://shtab.mos.ru/tpost/tbbx3thyo1-dlya-sferi-informatsionnih-tehnologii.

POLICY AND ECONOMY OF EURASIA
Powers of governmental authorities of the Russian Federation and governmental authorities of constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the field of waste electrical and electronic equipment management
NAGAYTSEVA Darya Alexandrovna
Postgraduate Student of the Department of Environmental and Land Law of Faculty of Law of Lomonosov Moscow State University, consultant of «Art de Lex» Law Office
119991, Moscow, Leninskie gory, 1, Russian Federation
Abstract: The article deals with the legal regulation of delimitation of powers of public authorities in the field of electronic and electrical equipment waste. On the basis of the detailed analysis of the legislation the author singles out the existing approaches to the concept of delimitation of powers and subjects of competence. The conclusion about legal certainty concerning differentiation of powers of public authorities of the Russian Federation and public authorities of subjects of the Russian Federation in the field of legal regulation of waste electrical and electronic equipment is made.
Keywords: authority, subjects of competence, waste electrical and electronic equipment, solid municipal waste, public authorities of the Russian Federation, public authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.
References
1.Konstituciya Rossijskoj Federacii (prinyata vsenarodny`m golosovaniem 12 dekabrya 1993 g., s izmeneniyami, odobrenny`mi v xode obshherossijskogo golosovaniya 01 iyulya 2020 g.).
2.Karapetyan L.M. Federativnoe ustrojstvo Rossijskogo gosudarstva. M.: NORMA, 2001.
3.Lazarev B.M. Kompetenciya organov upravleniya. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1972.
4.Razgranichenie predmetov vedeniya mezhdu federaciej i ee sub``ektami v zarubezhny`x stranax / otv. red. D.A. Kovachev. M., 1995. S. 8.
5.Remington T. Demokratizaciya, razdelenie vlastej i ob``em gosudarstvenny`x polnomochij v Rossii // Sravnitel`noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie. 2004. № 4. S. 26–40.
6.Ishekov K.A. Prezident RF v regional`noj sisteme razdeleniya vlastej: yuridicheskie i fakticheskie polnomochiya // Konstitucionny`e chteniya: Mezhvuzovskij sbornik nauchny`x trudov. Vy`p. 8. Saratov: Izd-vo Povolzh. akad. gos. sluzhby`, 2007. S. 16.
7.Kutafin O.E., Sheremet K.F. Kompetenciya mestny`x sovetov. M.: Yurid. lit., 1986. S. 23.
8.Tarasyan N.A. Kompetenciya mestnogo samoupravleniya v finansovo-e`konomicheskoj sfere: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Stavropol`, 2004.
9.Tixomirov Yu.A. Teoriya kvalifikacii // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2002. № 10. S. 22–32.
10.Tixomirov Yu.A. Teoriya kompetencii. M.: Yurinformcentr, 2001. S. 55.
11.Federativny`j dogovor ot 31 marta 1992 g. «Dogovor o razgranichenii predmetov vedeniya i polnomochij mezhdu federal`ny`mi organami gosudarstvennoj vlasti Rossijskoj Federacii i organami vlasti suverenny`x respublik v sostave Rossijskoj Federacii» // Federativny`j dogovor: Dokumenty`. Kommentarij. M., 1994.
12.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 24 iyunya 1998 g. № 89-FZ «Ob otxodax proizvodstva i potrebleniya» // Rossijskaya gazeta. 1998. № 121. 30 iyunya.
13.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 24 iyunya 1999 g. № 119-FZ «O principax i poryadke razgranicheniya predmetov vedeniya i polnomochij mezhdu organami gosudarstvennoj vlasti Rossijskoj Federacii i organami gosudarstvennoj vlasti sub``ektov Rossijskoj Federacii» // Sobranie zakonodatel`stva RF. 1999. 28 iyunya. № 26. St. 3176.
14.Postanovlenie Pravitel`stva RF ot 12 noyabrya 2016 g. № 1156 «Ob obrashhenii s tverdy`mi kommu-nal`ny`mi otxodami i vnesenii izmeneniya v postanovlenie Pravitel`stva Rossijskoj Federacii ot 25 avgusta 2008 g. № 641» // Sobranie zakonodatel`stva RF. 2016. 21 noyabrya. № 47. St. 6640.
15.Prikaz Minprirody` Rossii ot 11 iyunya 2021 g. № 399 «Ob utverzhdenii trebovanij pri obrashhenii s gruppami odnorodny`x otxodov I–V klassov opasnosti» // Oficial`ny`j internet-portal pravovoj informacii [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://pravo.gov.ru.

POLICY AND ECONOMY OF EURASIA
Statehood of the Chechen Republic and its importance within the Federation
VAGAPOV Musa Alimpashaevich
Postgraduate Student of Russian Academy of Advocacy and Notaries
105120, Moscow, Maly Poluyaroslavsky lane, 3/5, p. 1, Russian Federation
Abstract: The analysis of various historical and legal aspects of the formation and development of Russia, a multinational, multi-confessional state with a vast territory, a complex political and national history, cannot be considered complete and complete without a comprehensive study of individual segments, phenomena, which include the statehood of the Chechen Republic, which since the early 90s of the XX century was the most complex and a politically unstable region of the Russian Federation. As a result of the actions of destructive forces, the development of the statehood of the Chechen Republic was suspended. The Republic found itself outside the political and legal processes of the Russian Federation.
It took decades to restore the statehood of the Chechen Republic as part of the Federation and cost a lot of money, which was due to its importance in strengthening the Federation itself.
The author of the article offers his vision of the statehood of the Chechen Republic and its significance as part of Russia.
Keywords:statehood, sovereignty, state, federation, republic
References
1.Konstituciya (osnovnoj zakon) Soyuza Sovetskix Socialisticheskix Respublik: Prinyata 5 dekabrya 1936 g. L.: Partizdat CzK VKP(b), 1936.
2.Konstituciya (Osnovnoj zakon) Rossijskoj Sovetskoj Federativnoj Socialisticheskoj Respubliki, utverzhdena postanovleniem Chrezvy`chajnogo XVII Vserossijskogo S``ezda Sovetov ot 21 yanvarya 1937 goda. L.: Partizdat CzK VKP(b), 1937.
3.Konstituciya ChIASSR. Prinyata na vneocherednoj vos`moj sessii Verxovnogo soveta ChIASSR 26 maya 1978 goda.
4.Konstituciya Rossijskoj Federacii (prinyata vsenarodny`m golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesenny`x zakonami RF o popravkax k Konstitucii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 01.07.2020 № 11-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel`stva RF. 2020. 1 iyulya. № 31. St. 4398.
5.Soglashenie ot 8 dekabrya 1991 goda «O sozdanii Sodruzhestva Nezavisimy`x Gosudarstv» // Vedomosti SND i VS RF. 1991. 19 dekabrya. № 51. St. 1798.
6.Degtyareva A.K. Rossijskaya gosudarstvennost`: nacional`noe gosudarstvo ili gosudarstvo nacii // Nauka, iskusstvo, kul`tura. Vy`p. 4(24). 2019. S. 155–161.
7.Vengerov A.B. Teoreticheskie voprosy` rossijskoj gosudarstvennosti // Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Ch. 1. Teoriya gosudarstva. M.: Yurist``, 1996. S. 176–254.
8.Boby`lev A.I. Gosudarstvo, gosudarstvennaya vlast`, organy` gosudarstvennoj vlasti v Rossii: ponyatie, ix sootnoshenie // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2008. № 12(48). S. 16.
9.Vagapov M.A. Znachenie pravovy`x mexanizmov pri razreshenii politicheskogo krizisa na primere Konstitucionnogo stanovleniya Chechenskoj Respubliki // Vtory`e Kady`rovskie chteniya: Materialy` Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, posvyashhennoj 10-letiyu Referenduma 23 marta 2003 goda i prinyatiya Konstitucii Chechenskoj Respubliki. 2013. S. 159-172.
10.Afanas`eva V.I. Rossiya pervoj chetverti XX stoletiya: formirovanie gosudarstva novogo tipa. M.: Yurlitinform, 2018. S. 110.
11.Gakaev X.A. Ot deportacii chechenskogo naroda k ego politicheskoj reabilitacii // Vosstanovlenie Checheno-Ingushskoj ASSR – reshayushhij faktor reabilitacii chechenskogo naroda: Materialy` respublikanskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Grozny`j: SERLO, 2007. S. 6–7.
12.Munchaev Sh.M., Ustinov V.M. Istoriya Sovetskogo gosudarstva: uchebnik. M.: NORMA, 2002. C. 591.
13.Luk`yanova E.A. K voprosu o specifike rossijskoj gosudarstvennosti // Vestnik MGU. Ser. 12. 2002. № 31. S. 14.
14.Dekret VCIK RSFSR ot 30 noyabrya 1922 goda // SU RSFSR. 1922. № 80. St. 1009. // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava Chechni: Xrestomatiya. Ch. 1. Maxachkala: Tipografiya ALEF, IP Ovchinnikov M.A., 2013. S. 134.