NEWS
Интервью с членом Совета Федеральной палаты адвокатов Российской Федерации, Президентом Адвокатской палаты Республики Башкортостан Б.Г. Юмадиловым.: Интервью с Председателем Президиума Саратовской специализированной коллегии адвокатов, заслуженным юристом Российской Федерации, кандидатом юридических наук, профессором Н.П. Царевой: Интервью с доктором юридических наук, профессором, председателем Научно-консультативного и экспертного Совета Гильдии российских адвокатов, членом Научно-консультативного Совета Федеральной палаты адвокатов РФ, членом Научно-консультативного Совета при Ве: Интервью с вице-президентом Федеральной палаты адвокатов Российской Федерации С.И. Володиной: Интервью с доктором юридических наук, профессором, президентом Гильдии российских адвокатов, ректором Российской академии адвокатуры и нотариата Гасаном Борисовичем Мирзоевым:











RUS ENG
EVENTS
The 8th International Forum on Blockchain, Cryptocurrencies and Mining – Blockchain Life 2022
 
EVENTS
Best digital lawyers 2021
in the Russian Federation awarded

HISTORICAL EXPERIENCE
Bagreeva E.G., Sobolev K.V.
The relevance of the ideas of Ch. Montesquieu on public administration
Abstract: Purpose of the study is to analyze the relevance of the political and legal doctrine of Charles Louis de Montesquieu in order to improve public administration. Methods of historical, comparative legal, logical and system analysis were used to analyze the socio-legal reality.
It is argued that the theory of separation of powers developed by Ch. Montesquieu still acts as the main mechanism of «transparency» of power. Its advantages and disadvantages are analyzed in comparison with other theories of social structure. The authors give a reasonable assessment of its application in the context of the implementation of the modern approach of building a system of public authorities that meet the needs of citizens performing public administration tasks that affect the socio-legal progressive development of society.
The article provides an up-to-date analysis of the theory of separation of powers by Ch. Montesquieu, formulated the problems of political and social structure in the history of the development of states, which are predictive in nature, anticipating problems in the future.
Keywords: power, law, social structure, system of bodies, democracy, legal regulation
References
1.Makashova A.A. Princip razdeleniya vlastej kak osnova organizacii gosudarstvennoj vlasti // Pravo i pravoporyadok v fokuse nauchny`x issledovanij: sb. nauchn. trudov / pod obshh. red. S.E. Turkulecz, E.V. Listopadovoj. Xabarovsk: DGU putej soobshheniya, 2021. S. 248–252.
2.Montesk`yo Sharl` de Lui. Izbranny`e proizvedeniya o duxe zakonov [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://modernlib.ru/books/monteske_sharl/izbrannie_proizvedeniya_o_duhe_zakonov/read.
3.Gavrilov S.O. K voprosu o stanovlenii konstitucionnoj yusticii v SShA. U. Me`rbe`ri protiv Dzh. Me`disona // Yuridicheskaya nauka. 2020. № 11. S. 112–116.
4.Bronnikova Yu.A. Edinaya gosudarstvennaya vlast` i princip razdeleniya vlastej // Per aspera ad Astra – cherez ternii k zvezdam: sb. nauchn. st. Stavropol`: Fabula, 2021. S. 40–42.
5.Sotnichenko K.A. Princip razdeleniya vlastej v Soedinenny`x Shtatax Ameriki // Alleya nauki. 2019. T. 3. № 5(32). S. 549–551.
6.Xramushin V.V. Konstitucionno-pravovy`e funkcii institutov predstavitel`noj demokratii v RF: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2020.
7.Kozlovskaya V.I. M.M. Speranskij i sistema sderzhek i protivovesov v ego teorii razdeleniya vlastej // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. 2014. № 2. S. 8–14.
8.Barenbojm P.D. Koncepciya sderzhek i protivovesov v doktrine razdeleniya vlastej i v popravkax k Konstitucii Rossii. Otvetstvennost` institutov grazhdanskogo obshhestva v novoj konstitucionnoj vserossijskoj dejstvitel`nosti (NKVD) // Publichnaya politika. 2020. T. 4. № 1. S. 96–109.

PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND ADVOCACY PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Sachikhin A.V.
The review of New Draft Law «On Amendments to the Federal Law «On Advocacy and the legal profession in the Russian Federation»
Abstract: The article examines the legislative innovations proposed for adoption in the next Draft of the Federal Law «On Amendments to the Federal Law «On Advocacy and the Bar in the Russian Federation», prepared in 2021. The characteristics of the draft law are highlighted.
Keywords: lawyer, legal profession, lawyer chamber, Federal Chamber of Lawyers of the Russian Federation
References
1.https://regulation.gov.ru/projects#npa=123062.
 
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND ADVOCACY PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Savelyev M.V., Savelyeva M.M.
The review New Draft Law «On Amendments to the Federal Law «On Advocacy and the legal profession in the Russian Federation»
Abstract: Purpose of the study is to identify and assess the most significant features of the considered draft law. We used the method of system analysis, formal-legal method, method of studying documents, method of included observation, structural-functional method and other methods of knowledge.
The article examines the legislative innovations proposed for adoption in the next Draft of the Federal Law «On Amendments to the Federal Law «On Advocacy and the Bar in the Russian Federation», prepared in 2021. The characteristics of the draft law are highlighted.
The significance of the work lies in the fact that it formulates the provisions aimed stabilizing the regulatory and organizational development of the Bar in Russia.
Keywords: lawyer, legal profession, lawyer chamber, Federal Chamber of Lawyers of the Russian Federation
References
1.https://regulation.gov.ru/projects#npa=123062.
 
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND ADVOCACY PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Kurjanovich N.V.
Coronavirus as a mirror of Russian advocacy
Abstract: The aim of the work was to identify and assess the most significant features of the impact of coronavirus infection on the organization and activities of advocacy. The method of system analysis, historical method, formal and legal method, method of studying documents, method of included observation, method of structurally functional method and other methods of knowledge were used. The author examines organizational aspects of the Russian Federation Bar Association and Chambers of Advocates that resulted in degradation of the Bar in the context of the problems under consideration.
Keywords: lawyer, legal profession, lawyer chamber, Federal Chamber of Lawyers of the Russian Federation
References
1.https://legal.report/odobreny-revoljucionnye-popravki-v-zakon-ob-advokatskoj-dejatelnosti-i-advokature/.
2.https://uikod.ru/osobennaya-chast/razdel-4/glava-13/st-93-uik-rf/kommentarii.
 
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND ADVOCACY PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Sotnikov D.V.
Federal Union of Lawyers of Russia and trends in the legal profession influencing it
Abstract: Purpose of the study is the phenomenon of the Federal Union of Lawyers of Russia through trends affecting consolidation in the legal community. We used the formal legal method, situation analysis, information synthesis.
4 periods (stages) were identified: origin, formation, flowering and withering of FSAR; and at each stage – independent trends; substantiated the hypothesis why today the law firm does not have the appropriate registration in the form of a separate subject of law.
Currently, there is no scientific research of specific public associations of lawyers. Meanwhile, the "ward" system of organizing the legal profession has shown its ineffectiveness, and among lawyer's public associations there was a natural selection, during which from the numerous associations and unions created since the mid-90s. Until the beginning of the 2000s, only associations of social value for the legal profession remained. These associations should be carefully studied as a way of self-organization of the Bar in a natural way, in order to formulate proposals for creating a system more effective than the one available today.
Keywords: advocacy, advocacy, chamber of law, the rights of advocates, public associations of advocates, the system of advocacy, Federal Union of Lawyers of Russia, FSAR
References
1.Advokatskaya deyatel`nost` i advokatura v Rossii: v 2 ch. Ch. 1: uchebnik dlya vuzov / I.L. Trunov i dr.; pod red. I.L. Trunova. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Yurajt, 2020.
2.Advokatura v Rossii: ucheb. posob. dlya studentov vuzov, obuchayushhixsya po napravleniyu «Yurisprudenciya» / G.B. Mirzoev i dr.; pod nauch. red. G.B. Mirzoeva, N.D. E`riashvili; pod obshh. red. A.P. Galoganova. 6-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: YuNITI-DANA: Zakon i pravo, 2020.
3.Smirnov V.N. Advokatura Rossii na puti k samoopredeleniyu (1985–2003 gg.) // Rossijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. 2016. № 4. S. 204–217.
4.Smirnov V.N., Smy`kalin A.S. Advokatura i advokatskaya deyatel`nost`: ucheb. posob. M.: Prospekt; Ekaterinburg: Izdatel`skij dom «Ural`skaya gosudarstvennaya yuridicheskaya akademiya», 2021.
5.XI s``ezd Federal`nogo soyuza advokatov Rossii (20-letie FSAR) 11.06.2010 // Vestnik Federal`noj palaty` advokatov RF. 2010. № 3 (29). S. 13–14.
6.Kroxmalyuk A. Advokatov prizvali «vy`jti iz okopov» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.advgazeta.ru/newsd/402.
7.Sud vernul Trunovu status advokata [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/news/ 2016/12/30/671794-sud.
8.Vestnik Federal`noj palaty` advokatov RF. 2019. № 1 (64). C. 65–68.
9.Penn M., Fajnman M. Mikrotrendy`, menyayushhie mir pryamo sejchas: per. s angl. M.: Al`pina Pablisher, 2019.
10.G.M. Reznik. Zashhitnik 80-go urovnya. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2021.
11.Advokatura svoj vy`bor sdelala [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/advokatura-svoy-vybor-sdelala/.
12.Fyodorov M.I. Georgij Voskresenskij. Voronezh: AO «Voronezhskaya oblastnaya tipografiya – izdatel`stvo im. E.A. Bolxovitinova». 2019. S. 27–28.
13.Advokatskaya praktika nedeli // Kommersant``. 1994. № 176. 17 sentyabrya [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/89978.
14.Presledovanie advokatury`: Karataevshhina, redak-cionny`j material // Advokat. 2006. № 9 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://center-bereg.ru/j2542.html.
15.Samojlova I. By`vshij vice-prezident BRKA Romeo Farukshin prigovoren k real`nomu sroku kolonii [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3982618.
16.Kanarsh G.Yu. Problema privatizacii vlasti v Rossii // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2006. № 2. S. 102–107.
17.Ragulin A.V. Traktat ob Obrashhenii 32-x, principax, diskriminacii i demokratii v rossijskoj advokature: monografiya / predisl.: G.B. Mirzoev, poslesl.: A.V. Vorob`yov. M.: Rossijskaya akademiya advokatury` i notariata, Evraziiskij nauchno-issledovatel`skij institut problem prava, 2019.
18.Struktura AP SPb [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.apspb.ru/about/structure/sovet/.
19.Sovet Advokatskoj palaty` Respubliki Bashkortostan [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.ap-rb.ru/about/council_members/council/.
20.Vorob`ev A.V., Polyakov A.V., Tixonravov Yu.V. Teoriya advokatury`. M.: Grant``, 2002. S. 496.
21.Advokatskaya gazeta: speczvy`pusk. Prilozhenie k № 12(317), 2020.
22.Novaya advokatskaya gazeta: speczvy`pusk. Prilozhenie k № 7 (240), 2017. S. 4.
23.VikipediYa, Svobodnaya e`nciklopediya [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zolotuxin,_Boris_Andreevich.
24.Advokaty` XXI veka [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://bestlawyers.ru/best/b5.html.
25.St. 6 Ustava Obshherossijskoj obshhestvennoj organizacii «Federal`ny`j soyuz advokatov Rossii» (novaya redakciya), prinyatogo na Uchreditel`nom s``ezde Federal`nogo Soyuza advokatov Rossii 12–13 sentyabrya 1994 g. (s izmeneniyami ot 26.06.1999, 26.02.2000 i 05.06.2008).
26.Pikar E`. Ob advokature (paradoks): per. s bel`g. prisyazhnogo poverennogo M. Ketricz. M., 2020.
27.Reznik G.M. S drajvom po zhizni. T. II. Stat`i, doklady`, lekcii. M.: Granicza, 2018.
28.Gegel` G.V.F. Soch. T. 7. Filosofiya prava. M.: Kniga po Trebovaniyu, 2013.
29.Andrianov N.V. Grazhdanskoe obshhestvo kak sreda institucionalizacii advokatury`. Izd. stereotip. M.: Knizhny`j dom «LIBROKOM», 2015.
30.12 dekabrya sostoyalos` zasedanie Prezidiuma Federal`nogo soyuza advokatov Rossii (FSAR) // Vestnik Federal`noj palaty` advokatov RF. 2008. № 1 (19). S. 12–13.
31.Pavlova Z. Schetnaya palata postavila pod somnenie kachestvo yurpomoshhi, okazy`vaemoj zashhitnikami po naznacheniyu [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/schetnaya-palata-postavila-pod-somnenie-kachestvo-yurpomoshchi-okazyvaemoy-zashchitnikami-po-naznacheniyu/.
32.Federal`ny`j soyuz advokatov opredelil prioritety` // Vestnik Federal`noj palaty` advokatov RF. 2008. № 3 (21). S. 79–81.
33.Kroxmalyuk A. Forum projdyot pod e`gidoj FPA [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/forum-proydet-pod-egidoy-fpa/.
34.Sovet palaty` [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.apmo.ru/o-palate/sovet-palaty/.
35.FSAR nameren razvivat` vzaimodejstvie s FPA [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/fsar-nameren-razvivat-vzaimodeystvie-s-fpa/?sphrase_id=96697.
36.Poyasnitel`naya zapiska k proektu federal`nogo zakona «O vnesenii izmenenij v Federal`ny`j zakon «Ob advokatskoj deyatel`nosti i advokature v Rossijskoj Federacii» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/download/31AB79AA-8DB7-40EB-AD4F-2C73B3E68F0C.
37.Soyuz Advokatov Rossii – Vy`bory` Prezidentov Palat [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://unionlawyers-russia.ru/news/sojuz_advokatov_rossii_vybory_prezidentov_palat/.
38.Reshenie Lefortovskogo rajonnogo suda g. Moskvy` ot 17.06.2015, grazhdanskoe delo № 2-2095/2014 po isku Trunova I.L. k Advokatskoj palate Moskovskoj oblasti ob osparivanii resheniya Soveta APMO ot 21 yanvarya 2015 goda ob izbranii Prezidentom APMO Galoganova A.P. [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://lefortovsky—msk.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&name_op=case&_id=237936077&_deloId=1540005&_caseType=&_new=0&_doc=1&srv_num=1.
39.Zaklyuchenie o proekte federal`nogo zakona № 8388876 «O vnesenii izmenenij v Federal`ny`j zakon «Ob advokatskoj deyatel`nosti i advokature v Rossijskoj Federacii» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/download/7044AE9E-76AC-42E0-9CA6-5DDC36A282E6.
40.Trunov status advokata [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl5MsUPJKbY&t= 680s.
41.Rabochie voprosy` [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/rabochie-voprosy11524/.
 
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Agibalova E.N., Golubev A.E.
On the question of the legal nature of a domain name:theoretical and practical aspects
Abstract: The author's understanding of the term «domain name» is proposed in the article, the approaches existing in the scientific community to determining its legal nature through the prism of services, property, as well as means of individualization are considered. It is determined that a domain name can exist within the framework of such an object of civil rights as property, the right to which will be subject to appropriate legal protection. It is established that in cases where a trademark or geographical designation is placed in a domain name, only that part of it that consists of the corresponding object of exclusive rights will be protected.
The article has a high scientific value, since it includes a consistent and detailed analysis of the properties of a domain name, which is a fundamental element in the active process of digitalization of society. A reasoned and unambiguous conclusion is formulated about the place of this category in the context of the existing classification of objects of civil rights.
Keywords: domain name, legal nature, service, property, means of individualization, property rights, object of exclusive rights
References
1.Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (chast` pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ (red. ot 28.06.2021, s izm. ot 26.10.2021) // Sobranie zakonodatel`stva Rossijskoj Federacii. 1994. № 32. St. 3301.
2.Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (chast` vtoraya) ot 26.01.1996 № 14-FZ (red. 01.07.2021, s izm. ot 08.07.2021) // Sobranie zakonodatel`stva Rossijskoj Federacii. 1996. № 5. St. 410.
3.Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (chast` chetvertaya) ot 18.12.2006 № 230-FZ (red. ot 11.06.2021, s izm. ot 01.08.2021) // Sobranie zakonodatel`stva Rossijskoj Federacii. 2006. № 52. St. 5496.
4.Kazachenok O.P. Sredstva individualizacii xozyajstvuyushhix sub``ektov v mezhdunarodnom oborote // Evrazijskaya advokatura. 2021. № 2 (51). S. 89–92.
5.Nagorny`j R.S. Domennoe imya kak ob``ekt grazhdanskogo prava // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2008. № 2. S. 122–132.
6.Bobrov M.E. Sredstva individualizacii tovarov, rabot i uslug kak ob``ekty` intellektual`ny`x prav: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2014.
7.Kozhemyakin D.V. Domennoe imya v sisteme ob``-ektov grazhdanskix prav: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2017.
8.Fedotov D.V. Bestelesnoe imushhestvo v grazhdanskom prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2012.
9.Opredelenie Sudebnoj kollegii po e`konomicheskim sporam Verxovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii ot 17.11.2020 po delu № 305-E`S20-16127 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/05fcfc1f-dd75-48ab-998a-7c3c0f220c5b.
10.Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Samarskoj oblasti ot 23.09.2021 po delu № A55-28753/2020 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/6e60f75c-6d7d-4b0f-bb44-4debae8f7576.
11.Postanovlenie Plenuma Verxovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii ot 23.04.2019 № 10 «O primenenii chasti chetvertoj Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» // Byulleten` Verxovnogo Suda RF. 2019. № 7.
12.Pravila registracii domenny`x imen v domenax .RU i .RF (utv. resheniem Koordinacionnogo centra nacional`nogo domena seti Internet ot 05.10.2011 № 2011-18/81) [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://base.garant.ru/72194590.
13.Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda goroda Moskvy` ot 31.07.2015 po delu № A40-7572/15 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/82b59249-6427-46fc-a5ac-5047fbec7001.
14.Reshenie My`tishhinskogo gorodskogo suda Moskovskoj oblasti ot 30.11.2011 po delu № 2-4006/2011 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/85Gkbd1YN9rx.
15.Statistika domenov .RU i .RF za oktyabr` 2021 [E`lektron-ny`j resurs]. URL: https://cctld.ru/media/analytics.
 
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Bratukhina E.V.
Comparative legal analysis of will and inheritance contract as a basis of inheritance under civil law
Abstract: Purpose of the study is to conducting a comparative legal analysis of the substitute of the will and the novels of civil law - the inheritance contract, as grounds for inheritance under civil law. We used the formal legal, comparative legal, logical methods.
The author analyzes the procedure for the adoption and entry into force of the rules on the inheritance contract, their common and distinctive features, which make it possible to distinguish between adjacent legal phenomena.
Introduction into scientific circulation of the criteria for delimiting two similar legal subinstitutions of inheritance la – will and inheritance contract as grounds for inheritance under civil law.
Keywords: will, inheritance, inheritance contract, inheritance fund, joint will of spouses
References
1.Karxalev D.N. Nasledstvenny`j dogovor // Notarius. 2020. № 2. S. 32–35.
2.Osipov M.Yu. K voprosu o grazhdansko-pravovoj prirode nasledstvennogo dogovora // Nasledstvennoe pravo. 2019. № 2. S. 15–17.
3.O vnesenii izmenenij v stat`yu 256 chasti pervoj i chast` tret`yu Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii: Federal`ny`j zakon ot 19.07.2018 № 217-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel`stva RF. 2018. № 30. St. 4552.
4.Tuzhilova-Ordanskaya E.M., Atnabaeva Yu.V. Nas-ledstvenny`j dogovor i dogovor pozhiznennogo soderzhaniya s izhdiveniem: sootnoshenie ponyatij // Nasledstvennoe pravo. 2018. № 4. S. 38–40.
 
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Kiselev P.P., Fayzullina L.R.
Overview of some provisions of the legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Armenia:human rights aspect
Abstract: To familiarize with the peculiarities of the legal system of the Republic of Armenia through an educational program and exchange of experience between the subjects of human rights activities of Armenia and Russia.
The study used an overview method of accumulating information suitable for comparative legal analysis, as well as a method of educational and cultural exchange of experience in human rights.
The human rights potential of the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Republic of Armenia in regulating the jurisdiction of disputes between citizens and the authorities to the administrative court was revealed, a comparative analysis of these legal provisions was carried out with similar provisions of the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation, and positive provisions of the Federal Law «On the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation» were announced in comparison with the status of the Defender of human rights in the Republic of Armenia.
As a result of an overview of relevant legal practice through a special development program, the authors for the first time formulated legislative amendments to consider in administrative proceedings any claims about the illegality of acts of public authorities that violated human rights.
Keywords: Russian Federation, Republic of Armenia, human rights, legal system, comparative analysis, human rights potential
References
1.Grazhdanskij processual`ny`j kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 14.11.2002 № 138-FZ. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus».
2.Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossijskoj Federacii ot 08.03.2015 № 21-FZ. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus».
3.Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Respubliki Armeniya ot 05.12.2013 № ZR-139-N. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus».
4.Postanovlenie Plenuma Verxovnogo Suda RF ot 25.06.2019 № 19 (red. ot 29.06.2021) «O primenenii norm glavy` 47.1 Ugolovno-processual`nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii, reguliruyushhix proizvodstvo v sude kassacionnoj instancii». Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus».
5.Postanovlenie Plenuma Verxovnogo Suda RF ot 29.06.2021 № 22 «O vnesenii izmenenij v otdel`ny`e postanovleniya Plenuma Verxovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii po ugolovny`m delam». Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus».
 
HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Vinogradova E.V.
The death penalty. The contre force of Russian constitutional identity and international legal obligations
Abstract: Purpose is to study the influence of Russian and international principles, rules of law, constitutional va-lues on the refusal to use the death penalty in modern Russia. Historical-legal and formal-legal methods were used. The refusal to impose death sentences in the Russian Federation is conditioned not only by the adoption of international obligations but also by the legal area that has formed over the past decades, which creates a solid basis for strengthening the guarantees of human rights. The article has scientific value, since it examines the death penalty in the aspect of opposition and interaction of the Russian constitutional identity and the international obligations of the Russian Federation.
Keywords: Constitution, constitutional identity, international obligations, contre force, death penalty
References
1.Bunin I.A. Publicistika 1918–1953 godov. Sup iz chelovecheskix pal`cev. Otkry`toe pis`mo k redaktoru gazety` «Tajms». M., 1998.
2.Vinogradova E.V. Konstitucionny`e osnovy` reformirovaniya Konstitucii Rossijskoj Federacii // Obrazovanie i pravo. 2019. № 1.
3.Vinogradova E.V., Zaxarcev S.I., Sal`nikov V.P. Pravo, svoboda, zakon. Kontrfors // Obrazovanie i pravo. 2021. № 9.
4.Zor`kin V.D. Konstitucionnaya identichnost` Rossii: Doktrina i praktika // Zhurnal konstitucionnogo pravosudiya. 2017. № 4.
5.Ishhenko E.P. Smertnaya kazn`: proshloe, nastoyashhee, budushhee // Lex Russica. 2009. T. LXVIII. № 6. S. 1433.
6.Lixanova I.I., Lavrent`eva T.S. Problema smertnoj kazni: istoricheskij aspekt i sovremennost` // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskoj yuridicheskoj akademii. 2012. T. 15. № 2. S. 110.
7.Mal`ko A.V., Zhil`czov S.V. Smertnaya kazn` v Rossii: Istoriya. Politika. Pravo. M., 2003. S. 393.
8.Rossijskoe zakonodatel`stvo X–XX vekov: v 9 t. T. VI. Zakonodatel`stvo pervoj poloviny` XIX veka / pod obshh. red. O.I. Chistyakova. M., 1988. S. 211–396.
9.Monestier Martin. Peines de mort: Histoire et techniques des execution capitals des origins a nos jours. 1994. P. 292.
10.Protokol № 6 k Konvencii o zashhite prav cheloveka i osnovny`x svobod otnositel`no otmeny` smertnoj kazni [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.threefold.ru/ru.
11.Ukaz Prezidenta Rossii ot 16 maya 1996 g. № 724 «O poe`tapnom sokrashhenii primeneniya smertnoj kazni v svyazi s vxozhdeniem Rossii v Sovet Evropy`» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips.
12.Pis`mo Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federacii ot 6 avgusta 1999 goda № Pr-1025.
13.Opros rossiyan po voprosu vozvrashheniya smertnoj kazni [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://ria.ru/20191101/1560486013.html.
14.Postanovlenie KS RF ot 2 fevralya 1999 goda № 3-P.
15.Ukaz Prezidiuma Verxovnogo Soveta SSSR ot 26 maya 1947 g. «Ob otmene smertnoj kazni» // Vedomosti VS SSSR. 1947. № 17.
 
HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Klyukov V.D.
Constitutional system for the protection of human and civil rights in the Russian Federation
Abstract: Scientific research of the constitutional system of human rights protection in the Russian Federation, the peculiarities of the interaction of its constituent elements. Formally legal and comparative methods were used.
In the article, the main components of the structure of the constitutional system for the protection of human and civil rights are internally reasonably distinguished, revealing the nature and essence of the phenomenon under consideration: legal norms (recognition); actors who recognize, respect and protect human rights; human rights activities, including self-defense of rights.
The article has scientific value, since it is the first attempt to consider the constitutional system of human rights protection through the prism of Art. 2 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
Keywords: Constitution of the Russian Federation, human rights, system of protection of rights and freedoms, recognition, observance
References
1.Buty`lin V.N. Osnovy` gosudarstvenno-pravovogo mexanizma oxrany` konstitucionny`x prav i svobod grazhdan. M.: Akademiya truda i social`ny`x otnoshenij, 2002. S. 73–74.
2.Vitruk N.V. Obshhaya teoriya pravovogo polozheniya lichnosti. M., 2008. S. 351.
3.Marxgejm M.V. Zashhita prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v sovremennoj Rossii: sistemnaya konstitucionnaya model`, problemy` ee funkcionirovaniya i sovershenstvovaniya: monografiya. Rostov n/D: Rostizdat, 2005. S. 198–199.
4.Konstitucionnoe pravo Rossii [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.coe.int/ru/web/portal/home.
5.Lebedev V.A. Konstitucionno-pravovaya oxrana i zashhita prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossii: (Teoriya i praktika sovremennosti). M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 2005. S. 167.
6.Stremouxov A.V. Pravovaya zashhita cheloveka. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGUP, 2007. S. 78.
 
HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Demina E.P., Sozaev A.S.
Organization and legal status of ombudsmen in foreign countries: the example of Sweden, Germany and England
Abstract: This article examines the features of the ombudsman institution. The activities of this institute in different countries are detailed. The activities and functions of the ombudsman institution are highlighted. The general and specific features of this institution have been identified. The importance of the ombudsman and the mechanism of his activity in the systems of modern democratic countries are considered.
Keywords: ombudsman, human rights, ombudsman, Council of Europe, human rights activities, ombudsman models, legal status, appointment, protection of rights
References
1.Akt ob Ombudsmene Manitoby`. St. 2 (The Ombudsman Act, CCSM, Ch. O45) [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://web2.gov.mb.ca/laws/statutes/ccsm/o045e.php.
2.Gorbachev A.P. Specializaciya instituta upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossijskoj Federacii (Na primere upolnomochennogo po zashhite prav predprinimatelej): dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Elecz, 2015. S. 11–12 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://deanat.vse.edu.ru/f.php/1/director/hour/file disser/filedissier/704_Dissertation_Gorbachev.pdf.
3.Grabovskij S.I. Sovershenstvovanie specializirovannogo instituta upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossii: problemy` i perspektivy` dal`nejshego razvitiya // Vestnik Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo torgovo-e`konomicheskogo universiteta. 2009. № 6 (33).
4.Dudko I.G., Gagaeva E.A. Vliyanie evropejskogo prava na konstitucionnoe pravo gosudarstv Central`noj i Vostochnoj Evropy`: monografiya. M.: Yurlitinform, 2013.
5.Kaby`shev S.V. Municipal`ny`j ombudsmen: zarubezhny`j opy`t i ego recepciya v Rossii // Sravnitel`noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie. 2016. № 5 (114). S. 72–82.
6.Kalinina E.G. Specializirovanny`e upolnomochenny`e po pravam cheloveka v Rossii i za rubezhom: sravnitel`no-pravovoe issledovanie: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2016. S. 12 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://dlib.rsl.ru/rsl01008000000/rsl01008794000/rsl01008794652/rsl01008794652.pdf.
7.Kashkin S.Yu., Pokrovskij A.V. Iskusstvenny`j intellekt, robototexnika i zashhita prav cheloveka v Evropejskom Soyuze // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). 2019. № 4 (56). S. 64–90.
8.Kry`senkova N.B., Chursina T.I., Leshhenkov F.A. Ispol`zovanie cifrovy`x texnologij v koncepcii otkry`togo pravitel`stva za rubezhom // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel`stva i sravnitel`nogo pravovedeniya. 2020. № 4 (83). S. 67–79.
9.Larichev A.A. Specifika korporativnoj modeli mestnogo samoupravleniya i divergenciya sovremenny`x podxodov k samoupravleniyu na mestax v stranax Sodruzhestva Nacij // Pravoprimenenie. 2018. T. 2. № 4. S. 86–97.
10.Nesmeyanova S.E`., Kolobaeva N.E., Mochalov A.N. «Otkry`toe pravitel`stvo» i prava cheloveka // E`lektron-noe prilozhenie k Rossijskomu yuridicheskomu zhurnalu. 2018. № 5. S. 5–14.
11.Sereda M.Yu. Institut ombudsmena v Federativnoĭ Respublike Germaniya // Ombudsmen. 2013. № 2. S. 41–46.
12.Citizensadvice.org.uk; Complaining to an ombudsman [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.citizensadvice. A org.uk/consumer/get-more-help/how-to-use-an-ombudsman-in-england.
13.E Lgo.org.uk; The Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.lgo.org. uk.
14.Nash K. Human rights culture: solidarity, diversity and the right to be different // Citizenship Studies. 2005. Vol. 9. Is. 4. P. 335–348.
15.Ombudsman.gov.au; State and Territory Ombudsmen [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://ombudsman.gov.au.
16.Ombudsman.on.ca; Qmbudsman Begins Taking Complaints about Qntario Municipalities and Universities on New Year's Day: Press Release [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.ombudsman.on.ca/Newsroom/Press-Release/2015/L%E2%80%99Om budsman-commence-a-prendre-les-plaintes-a-prop.aspx.
17.Perth.wa.gov.au; Ombudsman service, City of Perth [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://perth.wa.gov. au/en/council/transparency-and-accountability/ombudsman-service.
18.Publications.parliament.uk; House of Commons Hansard Written Answers for 12 Feb 1996 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199596/cmhansrd/vo960212/text/60212w02.htm.
19.https://www.britannica.com/search?query= ombudsman+/.
20.https://rm.coe.int/1680630e5e.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Sangadzhiev B.V.
Some aspects of the organizing of protection of the procedural rights of individuals in the Russian Federation (on the example of criminal proceedings)
Abstract: In the article, the author, on some examples, justifies the conclusion that violation of the law entails negative legal consequences both for the legal system of the state as a whole and for specific persons involved in the process, in the form of annulment of procedural decisions, recognition of evidence inadmissible. The article concludes that the current Russian legislation does not always provide internal freedom of choice to a citizen in deciding whether to resort to judicial protection, whether to use the procedural rights granted to him in criminal proceedings.
Keywords: criminal procedure, judicial process, human rights, judicial protection, security, state power, law
References
1.Babich A.V. Processual`naya samostoyatel`nost` i nezavisimost` sledovatelya kak osnova ego statusa v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2012. S. 3.
2.Brusnicyn L.V. Obespechenie bezopasnosti licz, sodejstvuyushhix ugolovnomu pravosudiyu: mirovoj opy`t i razvitie rossijskogo zakonodatel`stva (processual`-noe issledovanie): monografiya. M., 2010.
3.Voevodin L.D. Yuridicheskij status lichnosti v Rossii. M., 1997. S. 36.
4.Zorin R.G. Kriminalisticheskoe i ugolovno-proces-sual`noe obespechenie realizacii zakonny`x rasporyazhenij rukovoditelya organa ugolovnogo presledovaniya // Problemy` sovremennogo sostoyaniya i puti razvitiya organov predvaritel`nogo sledstviya: mat-ly` nauch.-praktich. konf. (28–29.05.2010). M., 2010.
5.Kartoxina O.A. Nachalo i prekrashhenie ugolovnogo presledovaniya sledovatelyami organov vnutrennix del: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. SPb., 2003. S. 4–5.
6.SZ RF. 2004. № 34. St. 3534.
7.SZ RF. 2001. № 52. Ch. I. St. 4921.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Kudryavtsev V.L.
Obstruction of justice and preliminary investigation: problems of legislative technique and
its impact on theory and law enforcement
Abstract: Purpose of the study is to obstruction of justice and preliminary investigation through the problems of legislative technique and its impact on theory and law enforcement. Formal legal methods were used.
The article obstruction of justice and preliminary investigation reveals the problems of legislative technique and its impact on theory and law enforcement. It is established that the sought-after problems are the correlation of the categories of «obstruction» and «interference», as well as criminalization and unity (unification) of criminal law and criminal procedure terminology. It is concluded that the real or contrived problem of legislative technique associated with the formulation of the provisions of Article 294 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, in any case, becomes the subject of theoretical discussion and law enforcement problem.
The article has scientific value, representing a comprehensive analysis of obstruction of justice and preliminary investigation as a crime through the problems of legislative technology and its impact on theory and law enforcement.
Keywords: criminal law, crimes against justice, obstruction of justice and preliminary investigation, objective side, criminal process, comprehensiveness, completeness and objectivity, lawyer-defender, legislative technique, criminalization
References
1.Axmadullin A.S. Vsestoronnost`, polnota i ob``ektiv-nost` v dosudebny`x stadiyax rossijskogo ugolovnogo processa. M.: Yurlitinform, 2006.
2.Garipov T.I. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya, sovershaemy`e v dosudebny`x stadiyax ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva ego uchastnikami i iny`mi liczami: voprosy` teorii i praktiki: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Kazan`, 2015.
3.Zakonodatel`naya texnika: nauch.-prakt. posob. / In-t zakonodatel`stva i sravnit. pravovedeniya pri Pravitel`stve Ros. Federacii; pod red. Yu.A. Tixomirova. M.: Gorodecz, 2000.
4.Kim V.V. Ugolovno-pravovoe obespechenie nezavisimoj i bezopasnoj deyatel`nosti po otpravleniyu pravosudiya: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Stavropol`, 2003.
5.Kim V.V. Ugolovno-pravovoe obespechenie nezavisimoj i bezopasnoj deyatel`nosti po otpravleniyu pravosudiya: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Stavropol`, 2004.
6.Kommentarij k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii: v 4 t. T. 4. Osobennaya chast`. Razdely` X—XII / otv. red. V.M. Lebedev. M.: Yurajt, 2020.
7.Korobejnikov A.A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost` za vosprepyatstvovanie osushhestvleniyu pravosudiya i proizvodstvu predvaritel`nogo rassledovaniya: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Stavropol`, 2003.
8.Kudryavcev V.L. Nekotory`e voprosy` stanovleniya sostyazatel`nosti i osobennosti eyo realizacii v kontekste deyatel`nosti sledovatelya v dosudebnom proizvodstve Rossii // Voprosy` pravovedeniya. 2014. № 2 (24). S. 277–297.
9.Kudryavcev V.L. Advokat kak sub``ekt ugolovno-pravovoj otvetstvennosti: nekotory`e problemy` teorii i praktiki // Sovremenny`e tendencii razvitiya chastnogo prava, ispolnitel`nogo proizvodstva i sposobov yuridicheskoj zashhity`: materialy` V mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii: v 2 t. / otv. red. E.V. Trofimov. SPb.: SPbI(f) VGUYu (RPA Minyusta Rossii), 2019. S. 65–69.
10.Kudryavcev V.L. Vosprepyatstvovanie osushhestvleniyu pravosudiya i proizvodstvu predvaritel`nogo rassledovaniya: nekotory`e problemy` kvalifikacii // The scientific heritage. 2020. № 47 (4). S. 12–16.
11.Kudryavcev V.L. Obvinitel`ny`j uklon v deyatel`nosti sledovatelya i ego preodolenie: nekotory`e ugolovno-processual`ny`e i ugolovno-pravovy`e problemy` // Chastnopravovy`e i publichno-pravovy`e problemy` sovremennoj yurisprudencii: sbornik materialov II Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, posvyashhennoj 65-letiyu doktora yuridicheskix nauk, professora Viktora Nikolaevicha Grigor`eva (g. Ul`yanovsk, 12 sentyabrya 2020 g.) / otv. red. S.Yu. Morozov i O.A. Zajcev. Ul`yanovsk: UlGU, 2021. S. 247–254.
12.Kudryavcev V.L. «Opravdatel`ny`j uklon» v deyatel`nosti sledovatelya i ugolovno-pravovy`e problemy` ego preodoleniya // Aktual`ny`e voprosy` razvitiya gosudarstvennosti i publichnogo prava: materialy` VII mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (Sankt-Peterburg, 30 sentyabrya 2021 g.). / redkol.: D.V. Ry`bin (pred.), E.V. Trofimov (otv. red.) SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskij institut (filial) VGUYu (RPA Minyusta Rossii), 2021. S. 201–207.
13.Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo processa: Obshhaya chast`. M.: Yurid. lit., 1989.
14.Obespechenie sledovatelem vsestoronnego, polnogo i ob``ektivnogo issledovaniya obstoyatel`stv dela. M.: Izd-vo VNII MVD SSSR, 1977.
15.Ozhegov S.I. Slovar` russkogo yazy`ka / pod red. d-ra filol. nauk, prof. N.Yu. Shvedovoj. 14-e izd., stereotip. M.: Rus. yaz., 1982.
16.Pan`ko K.K. Osnovy` zakonodatel`noj texniki v ugolovnom prave Rossii: teoriya i zakonodatel`naya praktika: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. Voronezh, 2006.
17.Poyasnitel`naya zapiska k Proektu Federal`nogo zakona «O vnesenii izmenenij v Ugolovny`j kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii i Ugolovno-processual`ny`j kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii» (podgotovlen SK Rossii, ID proekta 01/05/09-21/00120664) (ne vnesen v GD FS RF, tekst po sostoyaniyu na 23.09.2021). Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus».
18.Ragulin A.V. Nezakonnoe vmeshatel`stvo v profes-sional`nuyu deyatel`nost` advokata i nezakonnoe vosprepyatstvovanie advokatskoj deyatel`nosti v ugolovnom zakonodatel`stve Rossijskoj Federacii // Aktual`ny`e problemy` ugolovnogo prava (osobennaya chast`): monografiya / pod red. G.B. Mirzoeva i L.A. Bukalerovoj. M.: RAAN, 2017. S. 189–212.
19.Ravenko N.I. Obespechenie sledovatelem vsestoronnosti, polnoty` i ob``ektivnosti issledovaniya obstoyatel`stv dela pri osushhestvlenii ugolovnogo presledovaniya: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2006.
20.Rajkes B.S. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost` za vosprepyatstvovanie osushhestvleniyu pravosudiya i proizvodstvu predvaritel`nogo rassledovaniya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004.
21.Sverchkov V.V. Ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast`: ucheb. posob. dlya vuzov. 10-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Yurajt, 2021.
22.Seryogina E.V. Vosprepyatstvovanie osushhestvleniyu pravosudiya i proizvodstvu predvaritel`nogo rassledovaniya. Prestuplenie protiv licz, osushhestvlyayushhix pravosudie, predvaritel`noe sledstvie i doznanie, a takzhe ispolnenie prigovora (st. st. 294–298.1 UK RF) // E`nciklopediya ugolovnogo prava. T. 28. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya / Izd. prof. Malinina. SPb.: MIE`P pri MPA EvrAzE`S, 2017. S. 94–152.
23.Skakun A.I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost` za vosprepyatstvovanie osushhestvleniyu pravosudiya i proizvodstvu predvaritel`nogo rassledovaniya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2008.
24.Sovetskij ugolovny`j process / N.S. Alekseev, A.I. Bastry`kin, V.G. Daev i dr.; pod red. N.S. Alekseeva, V.Z. Lukashevicha. L.: Izd-vo Leningradskogo u-ta, 1989.
25.Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Osobennaya chast`: v 2 t. T. 2: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod red. O.S. Kapinus. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Yurajt, 2021.
26.Ugolovnoe pravo: v 2 t. T. 2. Osobennaya chast`: uchebnik dlya vuzov / otvet. red.: A.V. Naumov, A.G. Kibal`nik. 5-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Yurajt, 2020.
27.Yakupov D.A. Problema obvinitel`nogo i opravdatel`nogo uklonov v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1999.
 
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF LAW SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Bagreeva E.G., Karavaeva A.V.
To the question of the relevance of legal psychology
Abstract: Purpose of the study is to analyze various problems of socio-legal reality in order to determine the relevance of legal psychology. To analyze the socio-legal reality, the concept of J. Ritzer was used, as well as methods of comparative legal, logical and system analysis.
Four socio-legal paradigms of the organization of reality are analyzed. At each level, problematic issues are identified that require study within the framework of legal psychology. Erroneous judgments that can lead to an increase in the level of legal nihilism are analyzed. The relevance of scientific research in the field of legal psychology, psychological aspects of personality in the system of law affecting the socio-legal progressive development of society is confirmed.
The article presents an original multilevel analysis of the socio-legal reality in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic, considered taking into account the expansion of the current capabilities of legal psychology.
Keywords: legal psychology, coronavirus pandemic, George Ritzer, levels of socio-legal reality
References
1.Alekseeva L.V. Vzaimootnoshenie psixologii i ugolovnogo prava v aspekte e`kspertologii // Psixologicheskiĭ zhurnal. 2002. T. 23. № 6. S. 60–71.
2.Ritcer Dzh. Sovremenny`e sociologicheskie teorii. 5-e izd. SPb.: Piter, 2002 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://studopedia.info/1-60719.html.
3.Vasil`ev V.L. Yuridicheskaya psixologiya: uchebnik dlya vuzov. 6-e izd. SPb.: Piter, 2009.
4.Sorokotyagin I.N. Yuridicheskaya psixologiya: uchebnik [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://urait.ru/book/yuridicheskaya-psihologiya-431818.
5.Gracheva Yu.V. Osnovy` yuridicheskoj psixologii, eyo celi, zadachi i mesto v sisteme nauk [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://studfile.net/preview/6704971.
6.Pozdnyakov V.M. Problemy` v razvitii sovremennoj yuridicheskoj psixologii kak nauki i oblasti psixopraktiki // Kochenovskie chteniya 2020: materialy` nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii s mezhdunarodny`m uchastiem (Moskva, 11–13 noyabrya 2020). M.: MGPPU,2020. S. 185–187.
7.Ratinov A.R. Izbranny`e trudy` / Akad. Gen. prokuratury` Ros. Federacii. M., 2016.
8.Shixanczov G.G. Yuridicheskaya psixologiya: uchebnik dlya vuzov. 2-e izd. M.: Zerczalo, 2006 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://ebooks.grsu.by/ur_psix/glava-i-predmet-zadachi-sistema-yuridicheskoj-psikhologii.html.
9.Vasil`ev V.L. Yuridicheskaya psixologiya. L.: LGU, 1974.
10.Dulov A.I. Sudebnaya psixologiya. Minsk, 1975. S. 13–17.
11.Shixanczov G.G. Social`no-psixologicheskie prichiny` prestupnosti nesovershennoletnix. Grodno, 1983.
 
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF LAW SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Kanatov T.K.
Legal regulation of exclusive rights agreements in the Eurasian Union countries
Abstract: At the moment, the science of civil law has not developed a single concept of the right to use exclusive rights, in this regard, the article examines the theoretical views of pre-revolutionary and modern scientists. In legal theory, these issues have been discussed for several centuries, the article reflects the most significant theoretical calculations of outstanding scientists on these legal controversial issues of different eras. Purpose is to study topical problematic issues of legal regulation of treaties on exclusive rights in the EAEU countries.
When writing the article, system-structural, specific-sociological, historical-legal, social-legal, comparative-legal, statistical methods of work were applied.
Proposals and conclusions based on the analysis of international legislation, as well as the regulatory legal acts of the EAEU countries that were in force at the moment. The high relevance and practical significance of this article lies in the analysis of the legal regulation of contracts on exclusive rights.
The article has a high scientific value, since it is one of the first attempts to consider topical problematic issues of legal regulation of treaties on exclusive rights in the EAEU countries.
Keywords: exclusive rights, EAEU, license agreements, agreements
References
1.Vitryanskij V. Sushhestvenny`e usloviya dogovora (Kommentarij GK RF (Prodolzhenie)) // Xozyajstvo i pravo. 1998. № 7. S. 4.
2.Vitryanskij V.V. Dogovor kupli-prodazhi i ego otdel`ny`e vidy`. M.: Statut, 1999.
 
POLICY AND ECONOMY OF EURASIA
Yakovlev A.Y.
Governing joint-stock companies with state participation in Russia: history, structure, legal basis
Abstract: Purpose of the study is to of the legal norms related to the formation in Russia of governance mechanisms for state joint-stock companies and law enforcement practice in this area.
The methods of systemic, comparative analysis, synthesis, systematization, generalization, as well as the formal legal method were used.
Legal, organizational (structural) and historical aspects of governance of joint-stock companies with the participation of the Russian Federation and Russian regions are considered. The features of governance of federal and regional companies are revealed.
The research results can be used to solve theoretical and practical problems of governance of joint-stock companies with state participation, as well as to create a more effective legal framework for their support.
Keywords: joint-stock company, joint-stock company with state participation, state joint-stock company, governing a joint-stock company, legal support of governing.
References
1.Korporativny`j uroven` sistemy` GiMU v Rossii // Informacionno-obrazovatel`ny`j portal «Gosudarstvennoe i municipal`noe upravlenie» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://gimyrf.ru/corporativnyj_uroven/.
2.Smotriczkaya I.I. Strategicheskie podxody` k povy`sheniyu e`ffektivnosti institutov gosudarstvennogo upravleniya // E`TAP: e`konomicheskaya teoriya, analiz, praktika. 2018. № 1. S. 45–60.
3.Smotriczkaya I.I., Anchishkina O.V., Cherny`x S.I. Problemy` i strategicheskie zadachi razvitiya instituta obshhestvenny`x zakupok // Problemy` prognozirovaniya. 2017. № 5. S. 70–78.
4.Olimpiev A.Yu., Majorova E.I. Nekotory`e aspekty` sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya i realizacii konstitucionnogo prava grazhdan na obrashheniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2020. № 1. S. 32–34.
5.Shagieva R.V., Ry`chkova K.A. Akty` organov mestnogo samoupravleniya v sisteme istochnikov rossijskogo municipal`nogo prava: problemy` teorii i praktiki // Obrazovanie i pravo. 2019. № 5. S. 22–29.

Index

Импакт-фактор российских научных журналов

The journal is included in the Highest attestation commitee`s of the ministry of education and science of Russian Federation list of the reviewed scientific journals in which the main scientific results of theses on competition of an academic degree of the candidate of science, on competition of an academic degree of the doctor of science have to be published (on the group of specialities 12.00.00 - Law Sciences)